Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE RECULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD DECEMBER 9, 1985 <br />LMCD ORDINANCE continued <br />It was moved by Councilmember Crabek, seconded by Mayor <br />Butler, to direct Orono's LMCD representative to vote <br />against this ordinance and transmit the Council's <br />concerns relating to the fee being required and decision <br />being mace by the Executive Director. Motion, Ages 5, <br />Nays, 0. <br />Councilmember Grabs�k stated that he wished to speak out, <br />for the record, reqarding the hMCD Executive Director in <br />order fcr things to be changed. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS <br />Planning Commission member Paul Taylor was present and <br />had no comments at this time. <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS <br />There were no comments from the public at this time. <br />ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: <br />#852 WILLIAM GREGORY* <br />1410 SHORELINE DRIVE <br />Upon applicant's request, it was roved by Councilmember <br />Frahm, seconded by Counci.lmr-mber Hammerel, to table this <br />matter until the ,January 13, 1986 Council meeting. <br />Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />#973 STEVEN RUCE/SCOTT LUSF* <br />4625-4665 NEST BRANCH ROAD <br />I.OT LINE REARRANGEMENT -- FINAL APPROVAL <br />RESOLUTION 11891 <br />Steven Ruce was present for this mat.to . <br />It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, securded by <br />Councilmember Hammerel, to adopt Resolution 01991 <br />approving a metres and bounds subdivision of a lot line <br />rearrangement for Steven J. Ruce and Scott R. I,use. <br />Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />#929 LYLE E. RAHN <br />1146 WILDHURST TRAIL <br />CONDITIONAL USH PERMIT <br />RESOLUTION 11892 <br />City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request for <br />a conditional use permit and variance for continued use <br />of the existing quest house. <br />Lyle Rahn was present for this matter end stated he had <br />read staff's proposed resolution and basically found no <br />problem with it.. He noted that the quest house does not <br />obstruct views and *hat no neighbors object to the <br />continued use of the guest hc-us-. <br />Mayor But '. er stated that she f e I t removal of the <br />structure would be more detrimental than leaving it as <br />is. <br />2 <br />