Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning file #929 <br />July 12, 1985 <br />Page 2 <br />2. There are conf 1 icting statements on f i e as to whether the <br />official minutes are accurate and whether ti,ey reflect the actual <br />intent of the Planning Commi.sion and Council in 1974 and 1975. <br />3. The structure was not, in fact remov- Only the frame cabin <br />portion was removed, leaving the f- and basement portion <br />remaining. <br />4. The remaining structur. �n used as a guest <br />cabin on occasion since the structed, -,nd con- <br />taiz)s plumbing. <br />5. Regardless of whether ..ructure is legally <br />existing on the property, t. house use requires a <br />eondit.onal use permit per 2onin .,uce Section 10.20, Subdivision <br />t. Mr. 2ahn's "withdrawal" of the application for a guest house <br />conditional use permit suggests that he intends to Discontinue <br />the use as a quest house. Regardless of whether a guest house <br />conditi!:..1al use permit is granted, the structure, by virture of <br />.its location partially within the 0-75' setback zone, is non- <br />conforming and subject to the pertinent c..-ainannes. A <br />conditional. use permit for recognizing any continued use of the <br />non-conforring structure would be appropriate if the structure is <br />allowed to remain. <br />Based on the f cts y 1 have be- give, what is your <br />recommendation: <br />a) ShoulO the ::on -co. for ing accessary structure he allowed to <br />rema_ ? <br />b) If it is allowed to remain, would you recommend a conditional <br />use permit for the guest 1-cLee use? <br />c) If you do not recoam-nd c,-,anting a conditional use permit for <br />guest house, note that staff must inspect the structure to deter- <br />mine necessary alterations within so that it will. not be con- <br />sidered as a second residential unit (i.e. plumbinq removed). <br />