Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING UELU NOVEMBER 18, 1985. PAGE 1 <br />ATTENDANCE 7:32 PM <br />CONSENT AGENDA* <br />The Orono Planning Commission met on the above date with the <br />following members present: Chairman Callahan, Rovegno, <br />Goetten, Kelley, McDonald, and Taylor. Sims was absent. <br />The following represented the City staff: Building and <br />Zoning Administrator Mabusth, Assistant Toning <br />Administrator Gaffron, and City Recorder Peterson. <br />It was moved by 1, nald, seconded by Goetten, to approve the <br />Consent Agenda* as submitted. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0. <br />1929 LYLE RAHN <br />1146 NILDRURST TRAIL <br />CONDITIORAL USE PERMIT <br />THIRD REVIEW <br />Chairman Callahan explained the .set for a conditional <br />use permit for guest cabin usage .,..oject to the hardcover <br />,U being made as conforming as is feasible and applicant <br />addressing the drainage problems both of which have been <br />submitted in Exhibits B c C. <br />Lyle Rahn was present for this matter and stated he had no <br />rbjections to staff's recommendations. <br />It was moved by Rovegno, seconded by McDonald, to recommend <br />approval of the conditional use permit subject to staffs <br />recommendations. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0. <br />1983 WA' I H. PEMBERTON <br />3580 wk., SHORE DRIVE <br />VARIANCE - SECOND REVIEW <br />Chairman Callahan explained the request to build a new house <br />and noted the four optional site plans submitted in order to <br />reduce the degree of variances needed. <br />Walter 6 Marilyn Pemberton were present for this wetter. <br />Marilyn Pemberton stated that they had the existing <br />structure inspection which was found to be totally out of <br />code with a bad foundation making it unuseable. Shy noted <br />that the main problemwas the need for 22' to back a normal car <br />out the garage. <br />Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron reviewed the four <br />optional site plans with the commission. <br />Lou and Marilyn Fegers, 3590 Shoreline Drive, were present <br />and at that their concerns were the possibility of <br />gradir inq done between the two houses and that the <br />propoo,...,ouse will stay in line with theirs. They stated <br />they had no objections ro a new residence being constructed <br />which wo,ld improve the area. <br />Marilyn Pemberton stated that the shape and style of the <br />Proposed house conforms aesthetically with the lot sire. <br />