Laserfiche WebLink
REGuf.AR MEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, NOVEMBER 14, 1983. PAGE 5 <br />{761 DOUGLAS SMITH Mr. Tuthill stated that he has sold his house as it <br />stands and that a lot line rearrangement wouldn't be <br />possible. <br />Councilmember Mammerel noted that it war, not unanimous <br />approval by the Planning Commission and noted <br />Callahan's comments which essentially meant that the <br />common ownership issue had to be dealt with first. <br />Councilmember Grabek suggested setting the date <br />earlier for resolution of the common ownership issue <br />from January 1 to their December 12 meeting. Grabek <br />noted that it is not fair to the citizens of Orono by <br />delaying this common ownership issue. <br />Councilmember Grabek moved, Councilmember Adams <br />seconded, to table Douglas Smith's applicatio,. <br />pending more information and that the C:1ith <br />application be brought back to Council on December 12 <br />for action based on the additional information. <br />Grabek asked for the following inf.r;rmation to be <br />submitted: <br />1. Additional information on the sewer and taxation <br />of sewer units. <br />2. What percentile this lot falls into with the <br />surrounding neighborhood. <br />3. How mor`gages are held in common ownership <br />situationF.? <br />4. If this lot has a sewer stub available and how it <br />was treated in the past. <br />5. Whether or not there was any tax abatement <br />proceedings. <br />Whether or not there was any cor.espondence from <br />the present owner about the status of this lot, <br />whether or not it was buildable. <br />In applicants letter, it states that similar <br />variances have bean granted and that the applicant <br />should identify which ones those were so that <br />staff can investigate those to see if a precedent <br />has been set. <br />Mntion, Ayes (5), Nays (0). <br />Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that all other <br />work on zoning applications would have to cease until <br />after the first of the year in order to allow adequate <br />staff time on the common ownership issue. <br />