Project Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

": :MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CllY COUNCIL l\:lEETING HELD ON JULY 22, 1996 (#4 -#2134 Robert. Albrecht -Continued) Jabbour moved, Kelley seconded, to approve the resolution as presented with the change in language wording as noted. He noted, if the motion were to fail, the next motion would be to table the application. Hurr asked if there was any time frame to which the ha:dcover restrictions would be limited. Gaffron said no time frame was set but it could be. Hurr said, if the motion were to pass, she would recommend a time frame be indicated. Vote: Ayes 2, Kelley, Jabbour; Nays 3, Goetten, Callahan, Hurr. Motion failed. Jabbour moved, Callahan seconded, to table the application to allow the applicant to consult with his attorney in respect to the denial action. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. The application is tabled to the August 12 meeting of the Council. (#5) #2136 GREENFIELD CORPOR.\TION, 180 NORTH SHORE DRIVE \VEST -PRELil\1INARY SUBDIVISION -SECOND AMENDED PLAN Laurie Lundeen and Mark Gronberg were present. Lundeen asked the Council members if they had been on the site. Goetten said she has been there but not actually walked it. Kelley said he had been there many times. Jabbour and Callahan have also visited the she. \fabusth reported that the applicant has provided an amended plan based on recommendations made by the Council. The original plan proposed a private road with cul-de-sac, and the first amended plan proposed a configuration of private road vrith driveway outlet. Ihe second amended plan proposes a 30' wide driveway outlet to serve lots 1, 3, and 4 only. There are no lot width variances required with the amended plan.' The owner of Outlet C, Bayview Farms, Second Addition, has been advised of the change. A private drivew·ay for that subdivision would be intalled \\-1thin outlets B and D. Callahan asked if the Staff ~ad any problems with the proposal. ~1abusth responded that the current proposal will not require lot standard variances. She also responded to a pre\.ious concern of the Council on why the Staff was so concerned \vith a road outlet being dedicated within this plat. Mabusth said the northeast access would serve as best}\ access for a future N/S through road. This was the City's opportunity to plat sections of a future road when surrounding properties are developed. Access from the west would benefit Waukman, as he too would be able to maintain views to lake and open space areas. Wauk.man was informed of this agenda item on the meeting and asked to attend if he had further concerns. Jabbour asked how this applicant could be expected to carry forward with the needs of another development. Staff responded that this is the basis for planning for future-needs. It is Stafi1s responsibility to address these issues. 3 I