Laserfiche WebLink
City of ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />10. The applicant has <br />'co any of the above <br />special treatment of <br />required lot standard <br />construct a residence <br />applicant's claim tha <br />will result in absurd <br />for the development of <br />Orono are not based on <br />founded environments <br />repeated throughtout <br />NO. <br />1 719 <br />not introduced any evidence contrary <br />findings. The applicant asks for <br />his lakeshore property questioning <br />s that prohibit applicants desire t , <br />on a portion of hi- property. The <br />t strict interpretation of the code <br />results are unfounded. The standards <br />lakeshore property within the City of <br />absurd aesthetic whims but on well <br />1 principles and factual findings <br />the Municipal Code and the City's <br />Community Management Plan. <br />11. Denial of this appeals application, and therefore the <br />inevitable denial of both subdivision and variance <br />applications, does not constitute a taking of property or <br />loss of substantial value because the property has always <br />been one residential building_ site, all of which has served <br />as required area, yard and open space for the residence <br />which con-cinues to occupy said property. The applicant <br />purchased the property in 1961 from his father who owned the <br />land and house in its present state since 1947, the <br />applicant has enjoyed its benefits as a fully conforming <br />residential. lot within the LR-IC zoning district for 23 <br />years, and could continue to enjoy the same benefit and <br />value without the proposed subdivision of the property. <br />Adopted by the City Council. on this 14th day of <br />Jat,uary, 1985. <br />ATTYS :' : <br />I <br />,tZ9roth Na' n City ('lerk Mary <br />y y y C. ler, Mayor <br />� j <br />Page 5 of 5 <br />