My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-25-1985 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1985
>
11-25-1985 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/11/2025 10:33:53 AM
Creation date
12/11/2025 10:29:21 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
151
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
To: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator <br />From: Jeanne A. Mabusth, 'Zoning Administrator <br />Date: November 20, 1985 <br />Subject: #991 William Ulrich, 1S35 Bohn's Point Road - <br />Conditional Use Perini,— <br />This is to advise you that t Planning C,)mmi lion called for a stop <br />work order for all building and g, ;ding activities at the Ulrich site. <br />They demanded immediate action because of the filling and gradinq viola- <br />tions within the 0-75' setback area and major filling and grading performed <br />by the applicant out of the scope of the original building permit and the <br />original grading plans. <br />The Bohn's Point neighbors reported that filling has been going on for <br />the past year and that now they were excavating the wetlands on the Blohorn <br />property. <br />Staff had worked with Ulrich after a strain" 'Line -;irid storm had <br />knocked down over 100 mature trees on the sit- and allowed him to do <br />grading and filling where trees were removed and repairs to a drainage <br />system that had been damaged. Ulrich has admitted that he did bring in <br />approximately 4000 cubic yards of fill later that year to prepare the <br />building site. This all appears mute in consideration of the building site <br />now. The huge stock piles of earth cover everything. The neighbors claim <br />the house has been raised above existing grade. <br />The filling within the 0-75' setback area does not involve major <br />charges in elevation but does involve filling of about 3 to b inches top <br />soil for planting of grass. Staff has requested silt fencing along the <br />entire disturbed area adjacent to t',e lagoon. It is my understanding from <br />s'-aff that this wall was done sometime around the third week of October. <br />1,ie applicant was advised to file an after -the -fact conditional use permit. <br />The additional filling and grading completc-1 within the original <br />Plohorn property and the Ulrich property is not c ; read by this land use <br />application and staff will ask that. a - sparate af•;.,__-•the-fact application <br />be filed. From reports of the neighbor- and building contractor's staff on <br />site, this work was completed on November 9th & 10th, a week before the <br />November 18th Planning Commission meeting. This involves major filling and <br />grade changes never reviewcd with btaff. <br />Staff has been advised by the hlic Works Department that the re- <br />porte,: excavation of the wetlands _nvolved the sewer con -Attic nd a <br />clean out pipe installed at the edge of the wetlands. ,lev.+tior. _ ` the <br />basement floor is at 933, the flood plain elevation o:' .5 requires that <br />the f loor be at a minimum elevation of 932.5; most City ..es would ask for <br />a 933.5 elevation. The f irst f loor or cei 1 ing of the basement is 1' feet <br />high. The vest portion or one third of the foundation will require 2 feet <br />cuts into the upper slopes. There i s nothing in our code that l imits the <br />height of a basement.. The height of a structure is determined , diagram <br />enclosed for your review, The house does not exceed 30 feet from proposed <br />finished grade. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.