11-12-1985 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

L7 City of OR, )NO RESO:OTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. Each separate parcel must individually conform to the provisions of this Chapter in connection with construction of improvements thereon. The property is divided by a Hennepin County road easement. The lakeshore portion of the property cannot satisfy the LR- lA zoning district standards and could not sustain a principal structure. 4. The five foot high fence as been placed at the inter- section of a public lake access and a County road. The access is used during the winter months from December 1st through March 1st. 5. The five foot high fence placed 20 feet from the center- line of the County road running approximately 200 feet along the edge of the 40 foot road easement creates a serious sighting problem and endangers users of .se the access and the County road. G. Properties like the applicant applicant's neighbors cr the many lakeshore properties along County Road 15, 19 or Crystal Bay Road are unique and would require special con- sideration through a variance review or proposed zoning amendment. 7. The applicant cl.airrs he is iimi.ted in the use of his residential lakeshore property because of the locution of the public access and the adjacent commercial properties. These uses exist today as they did when the applicant purchased the property. S. The City has agreed to construct a fence consisting of posts with a guard rail along the south side of the public access in order to deter the trespassers from �:ie public access. 9. The applicant claims that a five foot high privacy fence is required at the present location to provide much needed privacy for him and his family. The City staff has asked the applicant. to consider the use of a cabanna withn his dock area but applicant has refused this approach to solving privacy needs. Paye 3 of 7