Laserfiche WebLink
2811 Farview Lane <br />April 2, 1987 <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />2/9/87 Met with surveyor on the site per Nitz's direction, I asked for <br />elevations and location of proposed Farview access driveway, <br />elevations and location of septic test holes, culvr:rt and berm, <br />house corners as related to bottom of drainageway. <br />2/11/87 Received additional survey from Stugar-Roscoe-Fausch with most of <br />requested information (missinq traverse E-W from house to road <br />across basin - not critial item). <br />2/11/87 Call from Wyman Haherer, 2879 Farview, requesting status of "lot <br />next to him". <br />2/23/87 Received copy of letter to Nitz from Wyman Haherer dated 2/18/87, <br />requesting compliance with covenants and threating injunction. <br />2/24/87 Met with City Engineer, Glenn Cook, to review site - he verbally <br />noted that driveway lccation on Farview may be a problem because <br />of fill needed, location of culvert, and setback from County Road <br />84 and he suggested possibility• of access to County Road 84; also <br />discussed drainage concerns and suggested we require that a <br />storage basin be re4uired north of the culvert at south end of <br />lot to ensure that original intent of the subdivision grading is <br />continued. <br />Prior to 3/5/8 , Phone discussion wi t:h Nitz regarding change in attitude <br />toward access given new information regarding 6riveway location <br />proposed; discussed problens with septic location as related to <br />elevation of drainageway. Nitz to set up meeting wi"i principals <br />(Hennepin County Department of Transr)ortation, site evaluator, <br />etc.). <br />3/5/87 Meeting on si�.e with Nit-z/Gaffron/Gerhardson/Zetterstrom/Other - <br />Rathbun absen•.:; Hennepi:-, County DOT agreed to access at southeast <br />corner of lot on County Road 84 - paper work to follow. <br />See MPG notes 3/5/87 prior to site meeting. Plans turned over to <br />Jacobs/Oman for plan review, since site planning/zoning review <br />appears to oe reachin.• agreeable :;onclusion. <br />3/6/87 Met with F.athbun on site - no <br />a) slope on NY. side of lot too steep for mound; <br />b) MPG agree) that proposed si*es per Rathbun prior <br />reports are suitable only if: <br />1. house moves 15' south; <br />2. drainageway is redefined/regraded to protect <br />drainfi.eld site, i.e. provide a more channelized <br />flow ay.ound the bases. <br />!'12/87 Letter frLm Tom Jacobs tn Nitz requiring additional information <br />regarding deck joists and decking. <br />