Laserfiche WebLink
Minutes <br />City Council Regular Meeting <br />Monday, November 24, 2025, 6:00 PM <br />City Council Chambers 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 <br />Benson asked about trees that were going to be removed and replacement vegetation in the wetland. She <br />urged that native plants support pollinators and that Monarch butterflies be used. <br />Benson moved, Schwingler seconded, to accept the quote from TreeStory Inc. for $18,198 and <br />approve the oversight quote from Bolton and Menk for a fee not to exceed $3,400. VOTE: Ayes 5, <br />Nays 0. <br />PUBLIC WORKS REPORT <br />14. Navarre Water Treatment Plant Improvements (22-022) — Award <br />Public Works Goman presented the proposed award for the Navarre Water Treatment Plant water control <br />center, replacing equipment original to the building from 1971. He noted the bids had come in higher than <br />anticipated. <br />Persian moved, Benson seconded, to award the contract to Lakehead Contractors for $791,150, <br />including alternates one and three and the proposal from Bolton and Menk for construction phase <br />services. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT <br />15. LA25-000044, Scott England o/b/o Barbara Lupient, 3220 Wayzata Blvd, Sketch Plan <br />The City Council is requested to review the Staff report, receive a presentation, and discuss and provide <br />non -binding feedback. The proposal is for a development of 26 detached townhomes intended mainly for <br />empty -nesters on Lake Classen in the Highway 12 corridor outside of the MUSA (City services) line. It <br />would require rezoning from rural to a higher density and extension of the MUSA. It would include a <br />wetland conservation area around the lakeshore. The Planning Commission was split on the merits of the <br />proposal. <br />The City Council asked questions of the applicant's representatives, Mike Waldo, Ron Clark <br />Construction, and Tim Whitten, Whitten Associates, Architects. <br />Councilmembers pointed out that the City is going to begin looking at the Comprehensive Plan again in <br />2026, but this rezoning proposal would be driven by a developer, not the City. They called the <br />development thoughtful but questioned whether the location is appropriate for higher density. The <br />consensus was that the City is not ready to rezone at this time, but would look at that site during the <br />Comprehensive Plan review. They encouraged the property owners and potential developers to participate <br />in the Comprehensive Plan hearing process. <br />16. LA25-000039, Text Amendment regarding Retaining Walls <br />The City Council is requested to review the Staff report, receive a presentation, and discuss and adopt an <br />ordinance amendment to the zoning code to clarify retaining wall standards and allowances with the <br />required yard setbacks. <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />6 <br />