My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 4749
Orono
>
Resolutions, Ordinances, Proclamations
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7399
>
Reso 4700 - 4799 (October 8, 2001 - May 13, 2002)
>
Resolution 4749
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/13/2020 3:20:14 PM
Creation date
11/16/2015 12:30:10 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
colp) 0.1V\ <br /> /O O , <br /> gy1CITY of ORONO <br /> ,/ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> \kESHO�� NO. 474 ` <br /> 3. Planning Commission recommended approval by a vote of 5 to 1 to approve the <br /> variance to permit additional hardcover in the 75-250'lakeshore setback for a 7'deck <br /> extension and addition of the walkway to connect the lakeside deck to a small deck. <br /> Planning Commission made the following findings: <br /> A. The deck addition would be 3 '/2'out from the exterior wall of the house. The <br /> roof overhang extends approximately 3' from the house. Nearly the entire <br /> walkway would be covered with "hardcover" from the roof line. No <br /> hardcover is located below the walkway, thus the total overhead hardcover <br /> is virtually equal to the existing based on the walkway being located below <br /> the roof line. <br /> B. There is no deck to ground access from the existing lakeside deck, except <br /> through the house. The deck is approximately 10' above ground elevation. <br /> The walkway would connect to the side entrance and provide exterior access <br /> and an exit for the lakeside deck. Without the exterior access to the new <br /> walkway, safety is a concern. <br /> 4. Planning Commission also recommended approval of an after-the-fact variance to <br /> permit an existing garage to remain on the property located 7' from the property line <br /> where a 10'setback is required. Planning Commission recommendation is based on <br /> the following findings of fact: <br /> A. The lot is very narrow at the street. <br /> B. Relocating the shed further from the property line would move it too close to <br /> the existing driveway. <br /> C. The shed was located to be as far as possible from view to the adjacent <br /> property owner located at 4080 Dahl Road. The neighbor's house is located <br /> much further back on the property due to the unusual property dimensions of <br /> the two lots. If the shed were required to meet the required 10' setback, the <br /> shed would have to be moved further up the driveway and very close in <br /> proximity to the neighboring house. <br /> Page 2 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.