My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-09-1985 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1985
>
09-09-1985 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/4/2025 12:22:56 PM
Creation date
12/4/2025 12:17:43 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
237
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning Files #941, #946 & 0951. <br />August 14, 1985 <br />Page 4 of 5 <br />6. What form of ownership is feasible for these tracts? Single or <br />joint? <br />7. What combination of boat storage is acceptable? <br />a) 1 boat over 16 feet in length only <br />b) 1 boat over 16 feet in length only and 1 under 16 feet in <br />length <br />c) 2 boats each over 16 feet in length <br />8. Is there a special placement or pattern for dock construction that <br />should be considered for these tracts? The only survey on record for <br />these tracts is for the Thimmesh property - I have enclosed the survey <br />to assist in your review. <br />a) limit on dock width <br />b) limit on widt"s of boat slips <br />c) dock location within 20 feet width <br />d) tracts cannot qualify for use of buoys in lagoon <br />9. Use of land tract: <br />a) limit number of cars parked on land tracts to one <br />b)_ no parking allowed on Shadywood Road for riparian tract <br />users - nice, but how do you enforce? <br />c) other land use limits? <br />The Planning Commission felt the scope of their review of these <br />condition.ai use permits should not deal with questions of dock <br />construction, setbacks, etc. Issues dealing with riparian uses are best <br />left to the Marina Committee. They wanted to limit their review to the <br />non -conforming use issue. They unanimously agreed to recommend the <br />granting c` i conditional 3e permit for the continued use of these tracts <br />as legal -gin-conforming uses. The individual resolutions drafted by staff <br />include the necessary findings. <br />The total membership did not all agree on the limits to be placed on <br />the use of these tracts. Four of the six members voted to limit each of <br />the four docks to one boat olior 16 feet in length based on the dry land <br />area limitations of each property. The majority further recommended that <br />owned may only park on their .-espective land tracts and that non -adjacent <br />tract owners may not park on another non -adjacent tract owner's lots or <br />adjacent land ownerz' tracts without the written consent of the affected <br />owner. <br />The minority of two felt that limiting the docks to one boat was an <br />asonable and unfounded iimita ion not based on safety considerations. <br />The enclosed re5o1utions have been drafted based on the directives of <br />the majority opinion. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.