09-09-1985 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Zoning Files 4)41, #946 & #951 August 14, 1985 Page 2 of 4 Tracts R & 0 have container] docks s.Lncr the early 601s. Each dock, as with the others. maintain a zero lot lin,_! setback. Both docks have had each one sail bo«r over 16 feet stored for the summer season. To my knowledge there has never been another boat kept at these docks. Tracts Q & P are the land tracts providing a parking sp 7e. for each owner. Access to these tracts are via Dick C,le's property to the south. b) Donald C. Cook Cook has owned TracL E, a riparian tract since 1979 or 1960. The tract was originally owned by an adjacent land owner and when the subject owi.er sold his homestead lot, the riparian tract was not included the sale but sold independently to Cook. The covenants governing the iai ownership com:*-ations for the 'parian tracts owned by adjacent and 3wners expired January of 196_ Cook has maintained 1 boa' over 16 feet in length a•, of line dock since his ownership. Cook does not own the conti. 'Tact D. Dick Ogle owns 'Tract D. The land tracts serve as off -s pa..tili for car. Cook does not have sufficient dry land area to provide suitable par.•-'ng r one car. Cook is able to legally park or. County Road 19 but t be an arrangement that the City would wish to encourage. If no.. zonf.orminq •ises are to be approved by the City, their use must in I place any unr- cessz 1 hazards or risks in the use of the properties _eate nuisances -or t'e surrounding property owners or the general pv.blic. It would be preferable for Cook to acquire the use of Tract D for off-street parking purposes but in light of the available parking on adja- cent County Road 19, i� is difficult for the City to deny a conditional use permit to the applicaf.r because of safety factors since the dock has been used for the past five years without mishap. Limits oi, the une of appli- cant's dock would result in an in�-rease in safety - sts to be picke -up pur.lic landing areas rather tha;+ encourage addit,Qnal parking en County ad 19. c) John Thimmesh Thimmesh is the c ent owner of recently combined Tracts S .& T. This property remained wi; ..._he original owner/c.ev !loper's family un:,.Al 1984. It was the request of a potential buyer to b .i lcl a new dock t' ,o►cmenced this year iency review process. Tract S has ham_ a zero lot .fuck for many years. The applicant asks if this property could be d joint y with another individual. I have explained that this re,'.-.; may establish limits on the use of these docks so that joint ownershi, is impractical. He understands our concern but -3 1 sc asks that the City consider that a non- adjacent owner could mainta n - beats it, -xcess of the 16 foot i(�ngth and not e►tcroach on adjacent dock areas or r , ,e Hazards for navigation within lagooc,. I suggest+._i that the City would be wary of the potential to rent or le,.se the second siip and a(](., to the parking congestion problems within, the nE ighl ood. He advised t;-at this was not his intention but that he had planne at soma future date to acquire a collector type boat in excess of :6 feat length. I ._if-ivised Thimmesh to come b e-rl at that. timf, to amend nis or. igina i condi t ion., i urf. pormi , E ••r Council approval.