08-26-1985 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

July 3, 1985 Ms. Mabusth Page 4 These proposed setbacks are based on the following reasons: - To move the pool aq far out of the 75 foot lakeshore setback as possible and out of the 50 foot DNR setback. - To maintain a 10 foot or more setback adjacent_ to the house/ greenhouse for as much distance as possible. - The desire to have a pool of 21 feet in width which helps the safety concern of people, especially children, dieing from the short side of the pool. Emergency access can be accomplished to the east, south and west the pool easily and within the 13 foot setback on the north of the pool adjacent to the building entry/exit points. Again, the only restriction will be for a 16 foot wide area by the greenhouse. The pool can also act a convenient water reservoir for fire protection. In summary, the site, zoning qulstions and construction requirements have offered limitations to site u,i,ization. The required locations for the septic system necessitated moving the pool and created a hardship in finding an acceptable alternative location on this restricted site. These conditions of hardship include steep topog:*,phy, narrow area west of the house, existing vegetation and general unique character of the property in relationship to required zoning setbacks. The proposed po-.)1 use is permitted within the LR-1A district. The proposal will not alter the character of the locality. The proposed compensations for hard surface cover Lo control water quality and runoff along with efforts to move the pool out of the lakeshore setback as much as possible and minimize :he accessory structure setback variance, ire made to keep with the spirit and Intent of the zoning code. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me. Sin .erely, WESTW001- PLANNING 6 ENCII NQEFR I NG COMPANY Greg Kopischke GK/nd cc: Mr. 6 Mrs. Wt i; i am Cr(-gory