Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE. REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MI:I:'I'ING IirI,D AUGUST 12, 1985. PAGE 4 <br />t876 DEAN & NANCY MONGE <br />3444 EASTLAKE STREET <br />VARIANCE - FURTHER REVIEW <br />Dean Monge <br />was present for this hearing. <br />City Administrator Bernhardson explained the applicants' <br />proposed re -designed patio which would encroaci. the 0-75' <br />setback by 5 feet, and exceeding hardcover limits. <br />Mayor Butler felt that due to the circumstances of the <br />applicant's being caught in the middle of this matter, and <br />realizing the applicants' preference for the existing patio <br />and shape, she questioned whether it would be possible to <br />keep the octagon patio design and would be willing to give a <br />little on the encroachment of the 0-75' zone. <br />Asst. Zoning Administrator Gaffron stated that if the <br />octagon shaped patio were used it would encroach the 0-75' <br />zone by approximately 9'in a limited area. <br />Councilmember Adams stated that in other cases, property <br />owners with much stronger rationale and aesthetic arguments <br />have been made to conform with hardcover limits within the 0- <br />751. <br />Mayor Butler stated that the circumstances of this being a <br />piece of property formerly owned by a commercial enterprise <br />and sold to the applicant as is, makes this a special case. <br />Councilmember Frahm stated because of the uniqueness of this <br />property he would give within the 75-250' zone but feels <br />uncomfortable of giving any leeway in the 0-75' zone because <br />the builder directly went against what he was told by the <br />City. <br />Council unanimously agreed that if this was an initial <br />request by the property owner to construct this type of <br />hardcover within the 0-75' zone, it would have been denied. <br />Planning Commission <br />that because of <br />recommendation of th <br />the sidewalk within <br />the existing patio a <br />was noted that if 1 <br />Planning Commission <br />Representative J. Diann Goetten stated <br />the special circumstances, the <br />Planning Commission was to only remove <br />he 0-75' in front of the patio and leave <br />nd sidewalk to house as is. Again, it <br />his had been an initial request, the <br />would have recommended denial. <br />Mr. Monge stated that although the re -designed patio is not <br />as desirable as the existing patio, they would rather take <br />the re -designed patio than no patio at all. <br />It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by <br />Councilmember Frahm, to authorize staff to draft. a <br />resolution granting permission for the proposed 12'x18' <br />rectangular patio and adjoining sidewalk as recommended by <br />staff, and setting a deadline data of September 30, 1985 to <br />removed existing patio and sidewalk to lake. Motion, Ayes <br />(2), Nays (1). Councilmember Frahm voted nay. <br />