My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 4731
Orono
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7499
>
Reso 4700 - 4799 (October 8, 2001 - May 13, 2002)
>
Resolution 4731
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/16/2015 12:20:57 PM
Creation date
11/16/2015 12:20:57 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
., ,, . <br /> �--- <br /> /� �� <br /> � O �- o <br /> ��b_ - CITY of ORONO <br /> � � � . <br /> ti <br /> �� p'�' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> ��S_H� No. 473 � <br /> H. The barn is proposed to be approximately 1,700 s.f. in size. The Municipal <br /> � Code permits one oversized accessory building on a lot subject to the <br /> condition the building meets all required principal building setbacks and <br /> property owner shall agree to covenants that state: <br /> a) No future subdivision will be approved that places the structure within <br /> � a lot that has no principal structure, except that the City in its subdivision <br /> approval may grant a finite time period in which the oversized accessory <br /> structure may remain without a principal structure, in order that a principal <br /> structure may be constructed. At the end of this time period the oversized <br /> ' accessory structure must.,be removed if no principal structure has been <br /> � constructed. � <br /> b) If the property is subdivided, the oversize accessory structure and <br /> � principal structure will be located together within a lot that meets the <br /> • minimum lot azea requirement for the given size of accessory building. <br /> c) In subdivision approval,the setback required for the oversize accessory <br /> structure as defined herein shall remain. . <br /> 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it <br /> and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the <br /> variances will not adversely affect tra�c conditions,light,air,nor pose a fire hazard <br /> or other danger to neighboring property;would not merely serve as a convenience to <br /> the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is <br /> necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in <br /> keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the <br /> City. _� <br /> 6. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and <br /> recommendations of the Planning Commission,reports by City Staff, comments by <br /> the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and <br /> welfare of the community. <br /> � . . <br /> Page 3 of 7 � <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.