My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-12-1985 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1985
>
08-12-1985 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/4/2025 11:50:19 AM
Creation date
12/4/2025 11:39:58 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
454
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
IPETING <br />TO: Mayor and City Council <br />1 <br />FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administratoz�U iJ 0 <br />DATE: August 7, 1985 CIF G ©kulon <br />SUBJECT: Big Island Veteran's Camp/Hazardous Buildings <br />Proceedings <br />In your :ast Council pack t you received copie, of resolutions <br />for hazardous building F edings for all the buildings on Big <br />Island. Some of the or; 1 resolutions were for removal only, <br />but have made the decision to put, " bring up to code". However <br />in order to bring up to code some of the buildings would have to <br />be removed as they sit too close to one another to be in <br />compliance with the Uniform Fire Code. <br />Copies of the revised resolutions will be available for your <br />perusal at the Council Chambers the night of the meeting. <br />It is presently anticipated that the State will be turning title <br />for the property over to the Big Island Veteran's Camp Board of <br />Governors somewhere between the 1st and the 15th of September if <br />everything goes as anticipated. For this reason t is probably <br />appropriate that both t e current and prospe a owner be <br />included so we do not of ' to ge through the prc J i ngs again. <br />Upon our most recent ir,pection .he warning securing signs were <br />still on the buildings ind t,ad been secured as reasonable as <br />poi ,ibl.e against trespassing, except for one building that had <br />be,n broken in. Additionally the caretaker has been moved to one <br />of the other cabins that is more acceptable from a public health <br />standpoint. <br />It is not felt that ie judicial decision in the New Brighton <br />case is applicable in this case because of substantially <br />different facts. <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />It , requested that the Cour dopt the attached resolutions <br />and �re,er statutory haznt buildings proceedings be <br />appropriately commenced. ^r:,-e these have been filed with the <br />District Court, the owner ha.: Lays to respond. If it becomes <br />a contested case then it w;__ up to the Uistrict Court to <br />decide the appropriate disposition for the property and set <br />specific deadlines by which the owner •_.s'- comply. Absent <br />compl ia: a by !.r,e owner the Court can tht i irect the City to <br />undertake specific action and assess that ?ainst the property. <br />It is expected that if the City is required to do any work that <br />all the buildings would then be removed and we would so request <br />that of the Court. <br />It you hav- any further questions or comments please feel free to <br />contact me. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.