07-22-1985 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

M1iNUTI:S OF TIII: REGULAR 0)(0140 COUNCI i. MLL-1.1 NG HELD APRI L H, 1 9H:). 1'1%(;F PUBLIC COMMENTS Dunn noted that the 1985 plan is much better for the nciclhl)c)rs (cont.) and the neighbors prefer the 1985 plan. Dunn not -cc] that the LMCDdirector, Frank Mixa, insists that the 1981 dock plan is better. Councilmember Frahm moved, Mayor Butler seconded, to direct staff to contact Jo Ellen Hurr and have her set up an appointment to meet with Chaska Marina operators and Frank Mixa and LeFevre and try to estab) i sh commun i cat. i on between LMCD and Chaska Marina. .Motion, Ayes (5), Nays (0). #860 FUNK/ROGOSI}KFI,) 540 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD FINAL SUBDIVISION RESOLUTION #1743 George Funk and Judy Rogosheske were present. Zoning i 8'I6--IR-ANDY ASPLUND --3 4 4 4 EASTLAKE VARIANCE Administrator Mabusth noted that Rogosheske has submitted a letter in regard to their intent to join the Homeowner's Association that is involved in the upkeep of the private road White Oak Circle. Mabusth stated that the legal descriptions cannot be created until Council. gives final approval, therefore they cannot join the Homeowner's Association nnt.il the legal descriptions are submitted. Mabusth stated that this letter confirms the homeowners of White 0,-k Circle and applicants have resolved their problem with the covenants of the homeowner's association. Councilmember Frahm moved, Councilmember T. Adams moved, to aprrove Resolut.Lon $1743, A resolution approving the plat of White Oak Overlook.. Motion, Ayes (5), Nays (0). STREET Randy Asplund was present. Asplund presented pictures to the Council showing what type of fence is proposing. Mayor Butler explained that the ordina►. only allows a 6' fence along major thoroughfares and that Eastlake Street is not a major thoroughfare. Butler stated that she could not find any hardships to grant the variance. Randy Asplund stated that his only har: ship is for privacy. Asplund noted that the homes that were built are between $250-300,0000 homes and would like to seclude them from view. Asplund noted that all the neighbors were in favor and no view will be blocked. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron noted that the neighbors that did attend the meeting were from Bayside Road, not Eastlake Street. Councilmember L. Adams noted that he cannot f ind suf f ici ent hardships to grant the variance for the fence. Adams felt that to request. a variance to seclude the home with a fenc..e from the surrounding homes because it does not fit. in the neighboring homes is not. justification for approval of the variance.