07-22-1985 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

To: Orono Council Members COUNCIL MEETING z 21?85 From: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning AdminiV606F OROW Date: July 18, 1985 Subject: #876 Randy Asplund/Dean Monge, 3424 & 3444 Eastlake Street - Variances List of Exhibits Exhibit A - 7/12/85 Staff Memo to Planning Commission With attachments Exhibit B - 6/14/85 Staff Memo to Planning Comr..ission With Attachments Exhibit C - All Minutes to Date (Except 7/15/85 Planning Commission) You will recall that this item was partially acted upon anc partially referred to the Planning Commission at your May 28, 1985 meeting. I will attempt to summarize the action on this to date. 1. At the May 28th Council meeting, Council voted 2-1 to adopt resolution No. 1768, denyif. variances for an 8' high fence in the lakeshore yard (but allo« a 6' high fe%ce along the side and rear yard) for 3424 Eastlake Street and denying variances and ordering removal of the concrete patio within Lhe 0-75' setback zone at 3424 Eastlake Street by June 15, 1985; and ordering removal of the concrete patio and walks within the 0-75' setback zone at 3444 Eastlake Street by the end of July 1985. The Council further ordered `.hat the proposed screen porch for 3424 East.Lake and the propose(' deck platform for 3444 Eastlake Street be referred to the Plann_ng Commission for review. 2. A their June 17th, 1985 meeting, Planning Commission voted 2 to recommend approval of hardcover variances and a scr(•er porch addition for 3424 Eastlake subject to the following: a) Perforate or replace all the plastic in the rock beds. b; Any construction on ;he lake side within the 75-253' zone either with a screen porch or patio should he traded off i7 equal amounts with existing hardcover on the lake side of the house in the 75-250' zone. c) Driveway turnaround apron is not a necessity and is to be removed to reduce overall bardcovei 18'x161. These recommendations were made with the knowledge that the Council had ordered the removal of the patio, and based on the City not having issued a certificate of occupancy on this pro- perty yet, hence the City has not formally accepted tht- improve- ments to the property. At that same June 17th meeting, Planning Commission tabled the request for a deck platform at 3444 Eastlake in order to allow applicants to refine and redefine their proposal and for staff to provide hardcover calculations for 3444 Eastlake Str(,et.