My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-22-1985 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1985
>
07-22-1985 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/4/2025 11:28:00 AM
Creation date
12/4/2025 11:21:24 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
300
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA <br />TWIN CITIFI, <br />March 27, 1985 <br />Ms. Jeanne Mabusth <br />City of Orono <br />Box 66 <br />Crystal Bay, MN 55323 <br />Dear Jeanne: <br />Gray Freshwater Biological Inslitt;lc, <br />College of Biologu,al Sciences <br />P O Box 100 <br />County Roads 15 and 19 <br />Navarre. Minnesota 55392 <br />(612) 47T-8476 <br />r -- <br />V <br />h, M�iR 2 81985 <br />CITY OF ORO <br />am responding to a request for my comments concerning water quality <br />issues as they relate to dredging for establishment of a formal pond and <br />wildlife pond for the Gregory residence. <br />I understand that the dredged material from the wildlife pond will be <br />removed from the site and that the silt control fences will be in place <br />during construction to prevent suspended material from entering Lake <br />Minnetonka. <br />In general I favor the construction of ponds that increase water retention <br />capacit;; and thus opportunities for sedimentation and nutrient removal in <br />the Lake Minnetonka watershed provided that construction does not cause <br />erosion of materials into the Lake. Mature marshes and wetlands generally <br />release as many nutrients as enter the wetlands. Removal of previously <br />sedimented materials increases the capacity for nutrient remo-al. <br />I would like to see more of a buffer area at the edge of the wildlife pond <br />adjacent to the proposed erosion control fence. If the grading in this <br />area were at 929 for a distance of 50-100 feet on the edge of the pond, <br />emergent vegetation would filter sediment and other materials before it <br />entered Browns Bay. <br />The formal pond and wildlife pond will inevitably become choked with <br />aquatic vegetation and algae. Odors from decaying algae will be objec- <br />tionable and it is likely that control measures will be used. I do not <br />object, and in fact favor, aeration of the formal pond. Because the ponds <br />will communicate with groundwater I would like to see some restrictions on <br />the use of chemical agents to control algae and aquatic vegetation. These <br />restrictions, however, are hard to police. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.