My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-08-1985 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1985
>
07-08-1985 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/4/2025 10:50:28 AM
Creation date
12/4/2025 10:42:10 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
314
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL, MEETING HEI,D JUNE 24, 1985. PAGE 10 <br />ORDINANCE Mayor Butler explained ghat in the past the question of what <br />CLARIFICATION to consider hardcover was clearly defined, but with today's <br />(CONT.) innovative methods and proof that certain treatments work <br />and the Council has decided that they will not be considered <br />hardcover. Butler used the example of a variance <br />application to allow a deck 16" above the ground with a sand <br />base. Butler noted that the Council did not consider this <br />hardcover because the deck was placed on the ground and a <br />permeable material underneath the deck. Butler noted that <br />on the other hand a deck constructed 4' above the ground is <br />considered hardcover because of the potential for a future <br />owner to place plastic underneath the decking. Butler noted <br />that it becomes a policing probxem for staff. <br />Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron reviewed the Purdy's <br />request to add a deck and addition to the home. Gaffron <br />noted the existing hardcover is at 33% and the Purdy's <br />propose an equal tradeoff in existing hardcover for the <br />proposed deck and addition. <br />Councilmember Frahm statea that he is not sure that staff <br />would want to place themselves in a position to be able to make <br />tradeoffs in hardcover when the property is over the allowed. <br />Frahm felt that an equal tradeoff is fine for staff to make the <br />decision as long as the property is under the allowed <br />hardcover, but anything over the allowed hardcover in any <br />zone should come back to the Council regardless if the <br />applicant proposes equal tradeoffs. Frahm noted that the <br />key to bringing these applications to Council is the <br />documentation which gives the City the opportunity to file a <br />resolution in the chain of title placing a future owner on <br />notice. <br />City Administrator Bernhardson noted that a property that is <br />already over the allowed hardcover and does not have a <br />variance for it is technically in violation and it becomes <br />important to document tradeoffs on any such property. <br />John Purdy suggested that. the City clarify the ordinance so <br />that the homeowners will know exactly what is considered <br />hardcover and in order to be able to apply it to his property. <br />Purdy noted that his property has the least amount of <br />hardcover and least damaging compared with his surrounding <br />neighbors. <br />Councilmember Grabek noted that the City has recently begun <br />different approaches to hardcover. Grabek felt that which <br />way the hardcover runoff drains is of no concern to him <br />because it eventually runs into the lake. Grabek felt that <br />the way it drains should not be considered. Grabek stated <br />that Council should identify what is hardcover and what is <br />dangerous to the lakeshore. Grabek pcinted out that the <br />purpose of the hardcover ordinance is to maintain a certain <br />level of hardcover withir. the City. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.