Laserfiche WebLink
Memo #85-22 <br />page 2 of 2 <br />result in much, if any, extra expense for the City. <br />Because the County could not show the interest charged <br />each year on the individual tax statements, the City <br />would need to communicate the interest charged each year <br />to each property with an outstanding assessment balance <br />for this project. This would need to be done every year <br />until the assessments were all paid. This could be very <br />time consuming for the City staff. <br />,f we initiate the alternative A for this project it <br />will make it very difficult to not use it for future <br />projects if proposed by the affected property owners <br />(for example Stubbs Bay sanitary sewer). The annual <br />problem of notification of interest charges to the <br />affected properties then begins to have the potential of <br />becoming very expensive in terms of staff time and <br />effort. <br />