06-24-1985 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MAY 20, 1985. PAGE 2 6. Engineer to submit necessary hydraulic information in order to determine size of retention area on Lot 1 . City will ask that the area be designated as a drainage easement., the City will ask for a flowage and conservation easement over designated area. 7. Payment of park de ication fee of $600 ($200 each lot). 8. Dedication of right-of-way of 40' for County Road 6. 9. At the t ' me Lot 1 is developed, berming to be done along Outlot A to prevent runoff from f ] owing over mounds and to protect mound sites when road is constructed. Motion, Ayes (6), Nays (0). #916 G.W. KRIMMEL i BRUCE ENGELSMA 960 i 990 PARTENWOOD LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT PUBLIC HEARING 7:45 - 7:48 PM Teanne Krimmel and Bruce Engelsma were present. Mark %- nberg, surveyor, was also present. Chairman Callahan called for the public hearing concerning the lot line rearrangement for Krimmel/Engelsma. Building & Zoning Administrator Mabusth noted the certificate of mailing and the affidavit of publication. There was no one present in the audience for this scheduled public hearing. Building & Zoning Administrator Mabusth informed the Planning Commission of the applicants' proposal to rearrange the shared lot lines so that the existing improvements on each lot are located within their homestead lot. Mabusth advised the owner of Lot 2 that there may be a need to relocate the dock per realigned/ext.ended side lot lines. Mabusth noted for the record the dock setbacks as follows: dock length 0-50' - 10' setback from extended lot line dock length 50-100' - 15' setback from extended lot line Chairman Callahan closed the public hearing at 7:48 p.m. Goetten moved, Kelley seconded, to recommend approval of the proposed plat. of a lot line rearrangement for Krimmel and Engelsma based on the following findings: 1. The lots each contain the minimum required one acre in area. 2 All existing structures meet the required setbacks from the newly created lot line. 3. Applicant has been advised that the dock located on Lot 2 may have to he relocated per the above sett>ac•ks noted by r;tdf f . OWticm, Ayes (6), Nay (0).