My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1988-06-13 Memo, Property Line Fence Issue
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
F
>
Fagerness Point Road
>
1991 Fagerness Point Road - 18-117-23-41-0001
>
Correspondence
>
1988-06-13 Memo, Property Line Fence Issue
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/4/2025 10:03:14 AM
Creation date
12/4/2025 9:59:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
1991
Street Name
Fagerness Point
Street Type
Road
Address
1991 Fagerness Point Road
PIN
1811723410001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
To File 1991 Fagerness Point Road <br />!roes: Michael--1P --Gaffron, Asst Planning &/Zoning Administrator <br />Oates June 13, 1988 <br />Sabjc cts Pence between 1991 . 7crness Point Road and 1989 Fagerness Point <br />Road. <br />We were called out thin morning by the property owner at 1991 Fagerness <br />Point Road because the son of the property owner of 1989 was in the process <br />of moving the fence between the two properties approximately 8' to the <br />north. Upon arriving at he ai. te, Jeanne and I talked to Mrs. risher who <br />explained again to us tha.. she believed that the fence is her fence, or at <br />least the portion of it that has just been moved is her fence because it <br />originally was on her side of the court -determined lot line. She had <br />intended in the next day or two to remove the first approximately 30' of <br />the fence back from the driveway, in order to do landscape work, and was <br />not planning to replace the fence. <br />We also talked to a youngeaMO <br />it Rezabek who was hired by his parents to move <br />the fence 81: W- advised him to stop work on the fence immediately, and <br />Jeanne talked to +he senior Mr. Rf-abek over the phone regarding the fact <br />that in order to move the fence requires a variance, since it is in the 0- <br />75' lakeshore setback zone. Mr. Rezabek said he would apply for the <br />variance. <br />We advised Mrs. Fisher that Mr. Rezabek would be app Ong for a variance to <br />keep t'•e fence in its moved location, and that she was essentially on her <br />own if she decided to remove portions of the fence that were now located on <br />the Rezabek property. <br />To summarize, it appears that neither ;-zoperty owner has been able to <br />verify who originally built the fence, Fisher wishes to remove the easterly <br />30' of the fence and nct replace it, in order to landscape, and Rezabek <br />wishes that the existing 6' fence be allowed to remain on his side of the <br />property line. Staff's opinion remains that regardless of who owns the <br />fence, once it is removed or merely uprooted to be moved laterally, it no <br />longer is "grandfathered" and may not remain in the 0-75' zone without a <br />variance approval by the City Council. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.