My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-10-1985 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1985
>
06-10-1985 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/4/2025 9:31:11 AM
Creation date
12/4/2025 9:21:45 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
385
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• <br />TO: City Council <br />FROM: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator <br />DATE: June 6, 1985 <br />SUBJECT: #920 Lou Fegers, 3590 North Shore Drive - Variance <br />Zoning District - LR-lC <br />Application - Hardcover, setback variances to replace structurally <br />unsafe attached garage with living area. <br />List of Exhibits <br />IKETING <br />Exhibit A - Application Il�t{ 10 j��5 <br />Exhibit B - Property Owners List <br />Exhibit C - Plat Map <br />Exhibit D - Hardcover Calculations and Staff Revision of <br />Hardcover Hardcover Calculations <br />Exhibit E - Letter of Request <br />Exhibit F - Survey p.l - showing proposed addition and deck <br />Exhibit G - Survey p.2 - showing proposed extent of foundation <br />excluding decks <br />Exhibit H - Survey p.3 - showing hardcover applicant would be <br />willing to remove <br />Exhibit I - Planning Commission Minutes 5-20-85 <br />Mr. Fegers has an attached garage that is rapidly becoming detached. <br />He proposes to remove the garage, the dirt under it, and the existinq <br />failing foundation walls, and replace with actual living space. Ir. <br />the process, he proposes to "square off " the left rear corner of the <br />house, and will no longer have a garage on the property. In fact, he <br />would require extensive variances if he ever wanted to place a garage on <br />the property in the future. He also proposes to add a screen porch or, <br />the lake side of the house, and a deck walKway along the left side of the <br />house (see Exhibit F). <br />There is no question that the proposal will improve the appearance, <br />livability, and safety of the property. However, portions of the <br />proposed additions fall within the 0-75' setback area and will <br />increase the hardcover slightly in the 0-75' setback zone. I also do <br />not see a stairway leading to the ground from the deck; the applicant <br />has not indicated whether one would be installed. <br />Mr. Fegers and :iis builder have questioned the measurement of the <br />lakeshore setback as shown on the survey, noting that the water is at a <br />high level at this time. Indeed, by Code the lakeshore yard is <br />measured from elevation 929. 4 MSI,, which in this case is located at some <br />indeterminate point in the marsh vegetation bordering the open water. <br />In discussii-,g this with the surveyor, he noted that it is not feasible <br />to determine a 929.4 contour in marshlands such as this because the <br />hummocks and mucky soi 1 material do na yield a stable, un4 form bottom. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.