Project Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

i►INUTES OF A REGULAR 'iEETING HELD OCTOBER 15, 1973 Page 2 It was the opinion of the Planninq Commission DIVISION members that minimum lot size in areas that do 466S Bayside Roars not have public utilities will not be more than two acres per lot. In addition, it was felt that the 1S0' setback for stables uid not apply in this situation. The interpretation was that the 1S0' setback requirement was passed to prevent one property o► iier from infringing on tae rights of another, and not to limit someone from dividing 71 their property when the setback is acceptable to all affected property owners. ► Searles moved, Elliott seconded, that the division of 1.9 acres from Parcel 1412, Sec. 6, be approved, subject to a variance from the moratorium and t.►e Village Attorney's interpretation. of the set- cack requirement for the stable. Notion, Ayes (7) - N;tys (0). Elliott moved, Guthrie seconded, that a variance VARIANCE of 0.1S acres and 40' be granted from the size 1120 North Shore Drive and width requirement as well as a variance from Ordinance No. 149 for Parcel 2680, Sec. 7, because the area was platted before the existing zoning ordinance, and sewer is available. Searles moved, Guthrie seconded, that t:ie DIVISION & VARIANCE division of Lots 42-44 and parts of 45 and 64 3133 Casco Point Road of Spring Park, into two building sites, a variance of 5' from the width requirement of the westerly lot and a variance from Ordinance No. 149, be anproved, with the following conditions: 1. A lake setback that is compatible with the homes to the east must be maintained. 2. A drainage plan must be provided to avoid tae possibility of disturbing existing drainage. iotion, Ayes (7) - Nays (0). Tae Kvalstens have submitted an application for CONDITIONAL USE PEMIT a conditional use permit for the construction ZS95 Lydiard Circle of a duplex on Lot 2, Block 1, of Apple Hill. Van Nest recalled that this property nay- originally zoned commercial and when it was rezoned to half - acre lots, the understanding was duplexes could ue constructed there. Despite the fact that tae Navarre Task Force has recommended the reclassification of the commercial property to the nort;i of Lot 2, it was determined that another duplex would certainly fit in with the ch►racter of the area. Searles moved, Gasch seconded, that the conditional use permit be approved, subject to the Council's approval of a variance to Ordinance No. 149. ;lotion, Ayes (7) - Nays (0).