Project Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

;IINUTES OF A REGULAR 'IEETING HELD OCTOBER 1S, 1973 Page 2 It was the opinion of the Planning Commission members that minimum lot size in areas that not have public utilities will not be more than two acres per lot. In addition, it was felt that the ISO' setbacl: for stables did not apply in this situation. The interpretation was that the 150' setback requirement was passed to prevent one property owner from infringing on We rights of another, and not to limit someone from dividing their property wAen the setback is acceptable to all affected property owners. n arles moved, Elliott seconded, that the division of i.9 acres from Parcel 1412, Sec. 6, be approved, subject to a variance from the moratorium and tAe Village Attorney's interpretation f the set- cack requirement for toe stable. Aotioi, Ayes (7) - Nays (0) . DIVISION 4665 Bayside Road Elliott moved, Guthrie seconded, teat a variance VARIANCE of 0.15 acres .ind 40' be granted from the size 1120 North Shore Drivo jt id widt i requirement as w711 as a variance from Ordinance : u. 149 for Parce� 2680, Sec. 7, because the area was platted before the existing zoning orAina►►ce, and sewer is available. Searles move", Guthrie seconded, Mat tic DIVISION I VARIANCE division of Lots 42-44 and parts of 4S and 64 3133 Casco Point Road :F Suring Park, into two building sites, a variance o S' from the width requirement of the westerly i.t and a variance from Ordinance No. 149, be approved, with the following conditions: 1. A lake setback that is compatible with the homes to We east must be maintained. 2. A drainage plan must be provided to avoid tae possibility of disturbing exist_►lg drainage. iotion, Ayes (7) - Nays (0). T,►e Kvalstens have submitted an application for CONDITIONAL USE PE21IT a conditional use permit for the construction 2595 Lydiard Circle of a duplex on Lot 2, Block 1, of Apple Hill. Van Nest recalled that this property was originally zoned commercial and when it was rezoned to half - acre lots, the understanding was duplexes could be constructed there. Oespite the fact W at tie Navarre Task Force has recommended the reclassification of the commercial property to the north of Lot 2, it was determined that another duplex would certainly fit in with the character of the area. Searles moved, Gasch seconded, that t:►e conditional use permit be approved, subject to the Council's approval of a variance to Ordinance No. 149. e�otion, Ayes (7) - Nays (0).