My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-13-1985 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1985
>
05-13-1985 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/20/2025 11:32:44 AM
Creation date
11/20/2025 11:24:01 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
362
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL. MEETING HELD MAY 13, 1985 PAGE 4 <br />Mayor Butler argued that the Art Center will probal—ty appeal <br />anyway regardless of how many units they are assessed. <br />Michelle Combs of 1251 Briar Street noted that the Art Center <br />is saying that they don't need sewer and many Crystal Bay <br />residents said the sage thing but that the project has still <br />been ordered. Combs stated that if in the future the Art <br />Center needs sewer, they wouldn't be paying any construction <br />costs and would only have to pay hookup charges, and the <br />Crystal Bay residents in effect would have paid their hookup <br />charges. <br />Mayor Butler explained that anytime a new sewer project is <br />put in, the law dictates that you will hookup within 16 months <br />after the system has been declared ready for hookups. <br />Butler noted that if in the future the Art. Center hooked up to <br />sewer they would still pay the same assessment but with an <br />inflation factor built into the bill and could be higher than <br />what the Crystal Bay residents. paid. <br />Craig Christensen of 1251 Brown Road South asked if the Art <br />Center was to expand and the City was to assess the Art Center <br />more units, would that money be credited to the Crystal Bay <br />Sewer Project and reduce the residents assessment fee. <br />Mayor Butler explained that <br />assessed in the future, that <br />operating fund and would <br />assessments. <br />if the Art Center was to be <br />money would go into the sewer <br />not reduce the residents <br />Susan Enrieht, Art Center representative, asked the City to <br />clarify the reason for the inclusion of the Art Center. <br />Mayor Butler explained that when the City first considered <br />the Art Center to be included in t7e project, the City was <br />seeking federal funding. Butler stated that a survey was <br />done of the Crystal Bay area in order to determine their level <br />of need and it was discovered through that survey that the <br />majority of the households qualify as low and moderate <br />income, and as a result were eligible for state/federal <br />funding. Butler stated that the funding was not available <br />and the City spent many years seeking this funding. Butler <br />indicated that after the City found out the funding was not. <br />available, the Art Center was included in the project. <br />Councilmember Frahm stated that the City tries to get <br />commercial operations to hookup when they abut sewer <br />projects because of their more intense use of property. <br />Councilmember L. Adams stated that there also was a question <br />of contamination of ground water with the Art Center with the <br />chemicals that the Art. Center sometimes uses. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.