Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING FIELD APRIL 22, 1985, AT THE ORONO MIDDLE <br />SCHOOL AUDITORIUM AT 685 OLD CRYSTAI. BAY ROAD - PAGE 7 <br />PUBLIC HKARING Curt Quady of 1223 Brown Road South reiterated that the Art <br />(CONT.) Center should be included in the project. Quady stated that <br />15 years ago the City proposed sewer and would have cost the <br />residents only $1,500 and now it is $10,850/unit. Quady <br />stated that he was on the Counci 1 at that time and the Council, <br />through pressure, voted against the sewer project. Quady <br />disclosed that he was the only Councilmember to vote for the <br />project. Quady felt that the City should help pay for the <br />sewer project since the City made the mistake 15 years ago and <br />cost the residents $9,000. <br />John Ericson of 1620 Shadywood Road asked the Council for a <br />concensus on whether the Council will assess the project 50- <br />75-100 percent against the benefitting property owners. <br />Ericson asked how long it will take to include the Art Center <br />and the new development to the west in the sewer project. <br />Mayor Butler explained that the new homes west of the Art <br />Center are being developed on two acre lot sizes with <br />acceptable septic area and is outside of the designated sewer <br />service area that is part of the Comprehensive Plan. Butler <br />noted that the Comprehensive Plan involves the approval and <br />permission from the Metropolitan Council in order to have <br />that document changed. Butler noted that a public hearing <br />will be held on May 13, 1985, concerning the possibility of <br />sewering the Art Center. <br />Newell Weed of 1385 Orono Lane reported that his area was just <br />severed a few years ago. Weed stated that this was the first <br />time he has ever seen a Council propose something like this. <br />Weed mentioned that he cannot figure out why under a tax <br />paying system, the Council can't propose something that is <br />equally fair to all people. Weed noted that three years ago <br />the Council proposed sewer for the Minnetonka Bluf f s area and <br />never was a meeting held like this one because the Council <br />didn't even consider such a proposal. Weed stated that 100 <br />percent of the Orono residents in the Bluffs area were <br />against the sewer project and the Council still voted to <br />sewer the area. Weed reported that all of the Bluffs sewer <br />assessment was placed against the benefitting property <br />owners. Weed asked the Council if they can legally assess a <br />half a million dollars against non-benefitting property <br />owners. <br />Mayor Butler answered yes the City Council can assess non- <br />benefitting property owners. <br />Newell Weed of 1385 Ore .o Lane declared that the Counci 1 has <br />the power to assess to the public as much as they want to in <br />order to sewer the entire area without the general public <br />benefitting from the project. Weed stated that he was <br />chairman of the school board at one time and agreed with <br />Jentilucci's comments about people voting for the bond <br />issues that do not have chi ldren. Weed noted that everyone <br />