My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-13-1985 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1985
>
05-13-1985 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/20/2025 11:32:44 AM
Creation date
11/20/2025 11:24:01 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
362
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
I'a;�• 3 <br />City of ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. <br />12) The granting of such a variance would r::quire ..:mending <br />Lho. <br />man': sect:.ons of Cie Coml.,rehc;,sive PL-In Lhat ,overn <br />that <br />. rural development of the City. Tlie ;'it;I of Ur-or;o <br />has <br />be n cnnsistent in requiring a mini!s•.:rn of ti-O acres <br />for <br />a buildable lot in the r►lral areas ci; the City where <br />there <br />is no sewer service. <br />13) . <br />Thc, <br />granting of such a variance would require. Lt ..: rc oning <br />of <br />the property to an urban ?o`. size 'n adc:. _i! : to requiring <br />the <br />extension of City services tc t`te pro^erty to maintain <br />a suitable <br />level of fire rrotection. <br />14; <br />The <br />assessed `z.ir market era? ue of combin:.d 'Tracts. C and D <br />f. )m <br />1969 to 1982 !iow it assessed a= an incr.e~,�nt��l <br />value <br />whin compared to the zissessed fair r►•.rket value <br />of <br />comoineJ Tracts C and F cver the sa.^.e2 of time. <br />15) <br />V-.e <br />grantinc of the rec ►►iced variances •. oe.1,1 r _,salt in <br />:he <br />following violations of Section .32.3415 r:. 1P Zoning <br />Code <br />with which the applicant must firs: con ; ly be=c:re <br />the <br />-requ,ired variances can be granta is <br />►) <br />The variances would have an adverse aff ct upon <br />the <br />health, safety and welfa:-e o: the corn:.unity for <br />the <br />reasons outlined herein.. <br />b) the safety and welfare of th,.: comr:ur:i t:• :)•.� d <br />be, adversely of ected for the reasons outlir.�-_a, herc-;:n, <br />cspeciall,: increased traffic• an(' drainage :oblEr^:7. <br />c) The amcant of light and air in the neighburho_d <br />would be diminished by adding a structure on the <br />substandard lot. <br />d) The values of surrounding propertics will t•e <br />ziaversely affected. <br />e) There are no special conditions- applti•in,; to the <br />land in auestien r:hich are peculiar to the land or <br />i.rmedi•;rely ad}oin n(j pro;:erty. <br />t:) The condition of having a substandard lot cr two <br />adjacent substandard lots held in corrrion anplies <br />cene.rally in the lakeshcre residential districts. <br />y) They granting of the application is not necessary <br />for the ,reservation and enjoyment of a substantial <br />property right of the applicant. <br />h) The yrantinq of the variarcet; will impair the <br />1.�,alth, safety, comfort. .in1 be contrary to the i.n.te�nt <br />o: the Zoning Cucie end Ca:r,urehe,._;i%'e Vl an. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.