My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-13-1985 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1985
>
05-13-1985 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/20/2025 11:32:44 AM
Creation date
11/20/2025 11:24:01 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
362
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
.law <br />MINU'PI.S OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCII. MEETING HELD MAY 13, 1985 PAGE 9 <br />explained that when the building plans were submitted to the <br />City in December, 1984, he wrote to the City indicating his <br />concerns regarding drainage. Ramstad stated that the City <br />wrote to the builder indicating what the builder was t '.o to <br />avoid the drainage problems. Ramstad argued that the <br />builder has not complied with any of the concerns with the <br />City, and, consequently, this spring there is a severe <br />drainage problem and has caused damage to the Kane's <br />property. Ramstad noted that in addition there is a <br />drainage problem around the home that is being constructed <br />and that if a small child was to fall in that ditch that the <br />child most likely would drown. <br />Roger Ramstad mentioned that in the original agreement that <br />the builder was to put a 12" PVC pipe back prior to December of <br />1984. Ramstad stated that the drainage system has not yet <br />been installed. Ramstad asked the Council what they can do <br />to get the builder to finish the project and install the much <br />needed drainage system in order to avoid any courtrc <br />battle. Ramstad felt that the City should enforce the <br />agreement and require the builder to install the drainage <br />system. . ., <br />Mayor Butler stated that the drainage plan was part of the <br />accepted building plan. <br />Roger Ramstad reported that there is a problem with the <br />grading plan and felt that the grading elevations are not <br />being adhered to by the builder. Ramstad asked the City to <br />investigate into this matter. <br />Mayor Butler noted a new sink hole on the driveway across the <br />street that she suspects is a result of the lack of proper <br />handling of the storm water on the Lorge lot. Butler noted <br />that the Council could foresee these drainage problems which <br />was the original reason why they denied the vari._nce. <br />Councilmembei Frahm noted that he hasn't seen anyone working <br />on the property for six months. <br />Zoning Administrator Mabusth informed the Council than. n <br />underground drainage the was broken anu the water a-,+und the <br />foundation is preventing them from working until t y clear <br />up that problem. Mabusth stated that she was informed by <br />phone today that the MCWD has approved a temporary pumping <br />system to pump water from that foundation so that work may <br />begin again. Mabusth stated that the builder will be <br />submitting an amen(' drainage plan that would include <br />drainage from the c .:ken tile within the next day. <br />Counci lmember Grabek moved, Mayor But lerseconded,to direct <br />staff to require the owner to make corrections and meet all <br />new elevations and for staff to confirm if builder is <br />adhering to grading elevations originally submitted in the <br />grading plan by 3:00 p.m. by May 14, 1985. Motion, Ayes (5), <br />Nays (0). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.