Laserfiche WebLink
Note first that 29 of 78 existing wells are located less than the <br />minimum required 50' from septic system components. Also, note that <br />of 83 developed or developable properties, 21 (26%) could not con- <br />struct a new or replacement system within the confines of the relaxed <br />code standards, and 11 additional properties (another 13%) could only <br />construct a bed -type drainfield system which is generally less effi- <br />cient and more prone to failure than a trench system. <br />In addition, 27 properties (32%) would encounter major limita- <br />tions in trying to replace existing systems due to limited lot areas, <br />well locations, and the locations of trees, small storage buildings, <br />sidewalks, and other property amenities not enumerated in the survey. <br />Only 24 (29%) of the properties have what could be considered <br />substantial area available for replacement of septic systems. <br />III. Alternative Waste Management Methods - Review and Analysis <br />A. Options are to be reviewed per CSPP Policy No. 11. <br />The Orono Comprehensive Sewer Policy Plan (CSPP) was adopted as <br />Chapter 6 of the 1980 Community Management Plan. Policy 11 of <br />the Rural Sewage Treatment Policies contained within the CSPP <br />reads as follows: <br />11. ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT OPTIONS WILL OCCUR <br />IF SEWAGE. TREATMENT DEFICIENCIES ARE DOCUMENTED IN RURAL HOUSING <br />CLUSTERS. <br />In the event that multiple on -site system deficiencies should <br />occur in one of the existing isolated pockets of development in <br />the rural a2-ea, the correction of those deficiencies will be a <br />concern of the City, the neighborhood and the property owners <br />alike. Individual repair or replacement will remain the first <br />option. This may involve joint systems, acquisition of addition- <br />al land or selective condemnation. Other options include innova- <br />tive or '.ow -water systems, community drainfields or selective <br />condemnation. The extension of municipal sanitary sewer will be <br />considered only if the environmental and/or health problems can- <br />not be technically or economically resolved on -site and then only <br />if the neighborhood is adjacent to the existing urban area or <br />along the route of. the MWCC interceptor. In no case will the <br />land use density be increased or new areas opened for development <br />because of such a sewer extension. <br />The Sewer Facilities Plan section of the CSPP also discusses the <br />Alternative Waste Management Study and is incorporated herein by <br />reference. <br />A. Review and Analysis of Optional Waste Management Methods <br />OPTION 1. Alteration of the water consumption habits of the <br />users, including careful system maintenance. <br />6 <br />