My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-22-1985 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1985
>
04-22-1985 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/20/2025 10:46:14 AM
Creation date
11/20/2025 10:30:28 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
628
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO COUNCIL. MEETING HELD APRIL 22, 1985, AT THE: ORONO MIDDLE. <br />SCHOOI. AUDITORIUM AT 685 OLD CRYSTAL, BAY ROAD - PAGE: 4 <br />PUBLIC HEAVING to help some people keep their homes. But r asked <br />(CONT.) Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron to give tti,- public a <br />brief overview on the different options available to this <br />area. <br />Assistant 'Zoning Administrator Gaffron reported that the <br />Crystal Bay area is one of five rural housing clusters that <br />were identified in the Orono Comprehensive Plan (adopted <br />1980).as an area needing an alternative waste management <br />study. Gaffron noted that three of the five clusters <br />identified have been studied and have been sewered. Gaffron <br />pointed out the three areas as the Minnetonka Bluffs area, <br />the Scotch Pine/North Shore Drive area, and the West Ferndale <br />along County Road 15. Gaffron noted that these areas were <br />historically developed in dense clusters leaving inadequate <br />area for septic and well areas. Gaffron na;oed the Crystal <br />Bay area and Stubbs Bay area as the two remaining areas <br />identified in the Comprehensive Plan as needing sewer. <br />Gaffron explained that the Crystal Bay area is located next <br />to the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission's (MWCC) <br />interceptor and offers the opportunity for this area to hook <br />up to sewer. <br />Gaffron mentione-' that most of the septic systems in Crystal <br />Bay area are substandard in either design, location, or in <br />construction. Gaffron noted that this area has a very high <br />potential for future septic system failures. Gaffron <br />reported that out of 79 existing units, 11 systems are now <br />failing or have exhibited signs of failure. Gaffron pointed <br />out that 2 properties currently use holding tanks. Gaffron <br />noted that one commercial. property has no septic system and <br />no possible location to install one. Gaffron stated that 21 <br />septic systems of 83 properties in the Crystal Bay area <br />cannot. be replaced within the confines of the state and local <br />codes. Gaffron revealed an additional 38 (or 45%) will <br />experience difficulties in repairing their current septic <br />system. Gaf f ron stated that only 24 would be able to replace <br />their septic system. <br />Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron reviewed the seven <br />options available to this area: <br />OPTION I. Alteration of the water consumption habits of the <br />users, including careful system ,maintenance. <br />OPTION 2. Repair or reconstruc, )n of individual systems, <br />and replacement of existing sys,.ems with new individual <br />bystems conr'.ructed to City standards per Ordinance 210. <br />OPTION 3. Installation of innr-va;Ave on -site systems <br />including consideratir of composting or incinerating <br />devices and shared dr.air,Lield systems. <br />OPTION 4. Installation of a collection system connected to <br />a community drainfield. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.