My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 901
Orono
>
Resolutions
>
Resolution 0001-7547
>
Reso 0900 - 0999 (April 13, 1978 - February 27, 1979)
>
Resolution 901
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/16/2015 10:09:46 AM
Creation date
11/16/2015 10:09:45 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
107
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• <br />October 20, 1977 <br />Telephone 473.7357 <br />post Office Box 66 • Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 • Municipal Offices <br />On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka <br />Mr. Bernard J. Harrington <br />Metropolitan Waste Control Commission <br />350 Metro Square Building <br />7th and Robert Streets <br />St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 <br />Subject: Orono -Long Lake Interceptor, i91CC Project #71-13 <br />Dear Mr. Harrington: <br />The City of Orono is conducting a review of the Addendum #2 to the <br />Preliminary Engineering Report for the Orono -Long Lake Interceptor. <br />During the process of this review, several questions have arisen <br />which the City would like to have answered. <br />The Addendum #2 apparently is not consistent with the agreement <br />reached at a meeting with the P.C.A., Metropolitan Council, <br />Metropolitan Waste Control Commission, and the City of Orono on <br />March 11, 1977. I am enclosing a copy of our confirming letter to <br />that meeting showing the City's three concerns with the Addendum #1 <br />to the Preliminary Engineering Report that was dated February, 1977. <br />The flows as shown in Addendum #2 do not correspond. -to the flows <br />as agreed to in our meeting of March 11, 1977. I understand that <br />these flows are being revised downward and we are expecting a revised <br />Addendum #2 for our review. <br />The City•is.-unclear as to what the proposed sewer service area will <br />be for the interceptor as described.in Addendum #2. I am also <br />enclosing the map of the agreed on sewer service area at our meeting <br />on March 11, 1977. It was our understanding that this map would be <br />adopted as the official sewer service area map together with the <br />reduced flows in Addendum #2 to the engineering report. <br />Could you please advise us as to the present status of the revised <br />Addendum #2 and approximately when the City should receive a copy <br />for its review. The City would also like to know what sewer service <br />area map will be included with the reviewed Addendum #2. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.