Laserfiche WebLink
• _7 <br />PREFACE <br />During the past century, much of the lakeshore area now within the <br />Boundaries of Orono was subdivided and developed in a relatively haphazard <br />and unplanned fashion. Due to the lack of organized local governments <br />during much of the period, little if any, planning to protect and preserve <br />the quality of Lake Minnetonka was possible. The result has been pockets <br />of small narrow lots totally incapable of supporting on-site sewage <br />disposal systems. This led to lake pollution and public health problems <br />from septic effluents on lots and in the groundwater supplies which <br />problems have required Orono to complete three major municipal sewer <br />projects, including the construction of a central sewage treatment <br />plant. <br />In 1955, Orono was incorporated as a Village and the first attempts were <br />made at comprehensive planning and zoning. By 1965 the First Comprehensive <br />Zoning Code, which established the principle of protecting and preserving <br />Lake Minnetonka and the surrounding watershed and the groundwater supply, <br />was adopted. <br />In 1968, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, in cooperation with the <br />Lake Minnetonka Conservation District, directed a study of Lake Minnetonka <br />•by the Harza Engineering Company to determine the causes of pollution to <br />the lake and to recommend a course of action. The Harza study completed <br />in 1971 found the cause of pollution to the lake was a high input of <br />nutrients, specifically phosporus. It further concluded that the single <br />largest source of nutrient input at that time was effluent from the <br />municipal sewage treatment plants, located within the Lake Minnetonka <br />Watershed. The second single largest source of nutrients was contained <br />in the storm water run-off from the watershed. Because Lake Minnetonka <br />is fed by neither spring nor river tributary system, its sole source of <br />replenishment comes from the storm water run-off of its own watershed. <br />The recommendations of the Harza Study were to construct a system of <br />metropolitan sewer interceptors, to -remove from the Minnetonka watershed <br />the effluent of the seven municipal sewage treatment plants. The study <br />also recommended that, because the storm water run-off could not be <br />removed from the watershed, that the natural system of marshes and <br />wetlands must be protected and preserved, as it is the only practical <br />method of filtering'and removing the ever increasing nutrient load to <br />the lake, the surrounding watershed, and the groundwater caused by <br />increased urbanization within the Lake's Watershed District. <br />The Harza Study, as well as several subsequent studies, has concluded <br />that the nutrient input to the lake will increase as the level of urbanization <br />increases. These studies show that greater land use density could raise <br />the level of nutrients as much as ten times unless the present zoning, <br />specifically the two to five acre minimum lot size in the Rural Service <br />Area of Orono, is maintained. Other studies show that Lake Minnetonka <br />has a slow 25 year "Flush -out" period second only to Lake Michigan in <br />our region, which requires careful and continuous attention to the <br />quality of the storm water run-off flowing into the lake. <br />1i <br />