My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-25-1985 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1985
>
03-25-1985 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/17/2025 10:40:32 AM
Creation date
11/17/2025 10:32:18 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
255
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO COUNCIL. MEETING HELD MARCH 15, 1985 PAGE 9 <br />SALARY S BENEFIT <br />REVIEW FOR CITY EMPLOYEES <br />CY SMYTHE Cy Smythe w.s present. Smythe asked for Counci 1 direction <br />concerning the salary and benef it review for City Employee-. <br />Smythe explained that ever since the arbitration came via the <br />police to establish longevity programs for police it was <br />consistent with the majority of the Cities in the area. <br />Smythe stated that the City has never established a basis for <br />which they want. to pay anybody. Smythe stated that the City <br />should make such definitive decision for two reasons: 1) So <br />the employees and the Council know the basis on which they <br />will pay employees; 2) Because the legislature passed the <br />comparable worth act which indicates that the City has to do a <br />job evaluation study and measure the market in order to make <br />salary decisions. Smythe stated that the City should decide <br />how they wish to pay their employees based on comparison with <br />a relavent group of comparable Cities. <br />Councilmember L. Adams asked if the comparable worth study <br />has to be done with other public institutions or could <br />comparisions be made through the private sector where there <br />is market pressure to determ=.ne wages. <br />Smythe stated that the comparable worth act does not specify <br />public or private. Smythe stated that the Council should <br />decide what cities thFy would like to be compared with and <br />then Smythe can make a recommendation based on the results of <br />th(, study. Smythe stated that the City is currently <br />participating in a comparable worth study with Control Data <br />but such study results will not be available until <br />approximately December, 1985. Smythe suggested that the <br />City not pay City employees the same longevity as granted to <br />the police because longevity is a method of payment which has <br />been adjudged by arbitrators as unique to police and fire <br />employees. <br />Acting Mayor Frahm stated that the new City Administrator <br />should he involved with the creation of salary policy. <br />Smythe also noted that other cities do not offer longevity to <br />their employees (other than police and fire). Smythe stated <br />that the unskilled/semi-skilled public works employees are <br />overpaid compared with the market. Smythe stated that <br />unskilled/semi-skilled public works employee receives <br />approximately $9-11/hr when the market dictates $6/hr. <br />Smythe stated that the City is competitive with the private <br />sector as far as clerical help is concerned. Smythe stated <br />that a study could be done with 6-7 comparable cities i-1 the <br />western suburbs. <br />Councilmember Grabek asked for a comparable worth study with <br />6-7 surrounding cities ir, the western suburbs for Council's <br />information and the new City Administrator. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.