My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-17-2025 - Agenda Packet Planning Commission - Full Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2025
>
11-17-2025 - Agenda Packet Planning Commission - Full Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/12/2026 10:57:18 AM
Creation date
11/14/2025 3:44:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Administration
Admin Doc Type
Agenda Packet Planning Commission
Section
Planning Commission
Subject
Full Packet
Document Date
11/17/2025
Retention
After
Protection
Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
639
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
RemovalIncrease in haracover from 70% to 79% <br />Encroachment into the 75400t lake setback <br />of r' • to accommodate <br />A <br />)r1vate parties. Granting variances for nonconforming land uses and shoreland encroachments is <br />. • <br />variance11 <br />ate. If a • l ,.!thesemeasures• l reduce <br />the degree of nonconformity, provide <br />ecurity, and limit use when the site is not staffed for AIS inspections. <br />®rono Code Sec. 6.12.1320 —Permitted Uses states that within the LR-1 A Lakeshore Residential District, <br />a county dock is allowed only when: <br />a) It is directly connected to the county right -of way; <br />b) No overnight boat storage is permitted; <br />c) No canopy is installed; <br />d) It is approved by the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District; and <br />e) It is secured with a fence and gate. <br />ead to serious injury or death. It also exposes the County, City, and other permittmig agencies to <br />Ign icant litigation <br />I TO property owner or tenant nas created an attractive nuisance, which means they have <br />created conditions that r Iey know, or reasonably shouldknow, tG attract children <br />there is a ea. deal ofease law defining constructionandheavy an attractive <br />nuisance, <br />1i=' property • peowner or tenant knows,or reasonablyshould iiow, that children :o <br />trespasshe 1'.c / recreational areaftequented by children,some <br />/., which R <br />befishing F and not accompanied by adults. <br />The property owner It tenant knows, or should know, the attractive nuisance have <br />created presents 1" injury or death to a trespassing now the case. <br />The trespassing children are unaware of the risk created by the attractive nuisance � young <br />children are prone to take risks, <br />The property owner 1' tenant falls °o1 exercise ., reasonable .,, of care to protect <br />children from harm due to the attractive nuisance — the county is notputting any limits on <br />commercial of1he site, <br />The children sustain harm due to the attractive nuisance � again, many examples can be <br />found in case law. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.