11-17-2025 - Agenda Packet Planning Commission - Full Packet

Home Browse Search

increase in hardcover trom�hfr'151671 Encroachment • 75400t lake setback Removal of trees and vegetation to accommodate new facilities •. • • • • • 4 _ • • _ .- • • •• •• • •. • • •� ,• , precede _. • 1 • _•r •rm ind Uses.) rate. If a variance is considered, these measures would reduce the degree of nonconformity, provide . • limit use when the site is not-d for AIS inspections. Orono Code Sec. 6.12.1320 —Permitted Uses states that withiYl the LR-1 A Lakeshore Residential District, a county dock is allowed only when: a) It is directly connected to the county right-of-way; b) No overnight boat storage is permitted; c) No canopy is installed, d) It is approved by the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District; and e) It is secured with a fence and gate. litigationeacl to serious injury or death. It also exposes the County, City, and other permitting agencies to Te property owner or fenanthas 1' an actractive nuisance,which means they have childrencreated conditions that they know, or reasonably should know, are likely to attract there is a great deal ofcase lawdefiningconstruction and heap as an attractive The property owner or tenant knows, or reasonably should know, that children are likely to trespass into their r gyp , , / recreational areaftequented by children,/ ofwhich, befishing and not accompanied by adults, The o . owner tenant noor shouldor, they ,, have created presents a risk of injury or death to a trespassing child � this is now the case. The trespassing children are une of the risk created by the a oung children are prone / take risksd The propertyowner .noi to exercise a reasonabledegree o; pro tect . i3.� children from harm due to the attractive nuisance — the county is notputting any limits on commercial of the site. The children sustain harm due to the attractive nuisance � again, many examples can be found in case/,