Laserfiche WebLink
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ANALYSIS (SECTION 6.12.4090) <br />The Planning Commission may recommend and the Council may grant a Conditional Use Permit <br />(CUP) as the use permit was applied for or in modified form. On the basis of the application and the <br />evidence submitted, the city must find that the proposed use at the proposed location is or will be: <br />1) Consistent with the community management plan; the proposed development of the property <br />for public boat landing to support access to Lake Minnetonka is consistent with the <br />community management plan of a Park and Recreational Space. <br />2) Compliant with the zoning code, including any conditions imposed on specific uses as required <br />by article V, division 3 of the City Code; The property will maintain the existing use, which is <br />legally nonconforming, to support a public boat launch. <br />3) Adequately served by police, fire, roads, and stormwater management; The proposed project <br />improves the stormwater management on the site and accessibility with a new parking lot <br />design. This criterion is met. <br />4) Provided with an adequate water supply and sewage disposal system; This criterion is met. <br />5) Not expected to generate excessive demand for public services at public cost; in the opinion of <br />staff this criterion is met. The existing use of a public boat launch is being maintained. Any <br />additional demand for public services from the site will be coordinated with Hennepin <br />County as the property owner. <br />6) Compatible with the surrounding area as the area is used both presently and as it is planned to be <br />used in the future; The property will maintain the existing use which is legally <br />nonconforming to support a public boat launch which is consistent with the existing <br />conditions for the neighborhood and surrounding uses. <br />7) Consistent with the character of the surrounding area, unless a change of character is called for in <br />the community management plan; The property will maintain the existing, legally <br />nonconforming use to support a public boat launch which is consistent with the existing <br />conditions for the neighborhood and surrounding uses. The site is consistent with the <br />community management plan. <br />8) Compatible with the character of buildings and site improvements in the surrounding area, unless <br />a change of character is called for in the community management plan; The proposed seawall <br />along the eastern edge of the parcel is compatible with the community management plan. <br />Efforts should be made to incorporate a natural shoreline around the property where <br />possible as to not limit use of the site for the public. <br />9) Not expected to substantially impair the use and enjoyment of the property in the area or have a <br />materially adverse impact on the property values in the area when compared to the impairment or <br />impact of generally permitted uses. The proposed site improvements require review and <br />approval by other governmental agencies such as MCWD, DNR and LMCD. The proposed <br />seawall will not have adverse impact on the neighborhood. <br />10) Provided with screening and buffering adequate to mitigate undesirable views and activities likely <br />to disturb surrounding uses; The applicant has submitted landscape and lighting plans to <br />mitigate views for the abutting properties and limits activities on the site. <br />11) Not create a nuisance which generates smoke, noise, glare, vibration, odors, fumes, dust, <br />electrical interference, general unsightliness, or other means; The applicants will be required to <br />adhere to the City's erosion control regulations as well as the permitting requirements of <br />the DNR, LMCD, and MCWD. Timely re -vegetation and stabilization will be a requirement <br />of the permitting process. The project should not result in a nuisance condition. <br />24 <br />