My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-17-2025 - Agenda Packet Planning Commission - Full Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2025
>
11-17-2025 - Agenda Packet Planning Commission - Full Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/12/2026 10:57:18 AM
Creation date
11/14/2025 3:44:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Administration
Admin Doc Type
Agenda Packet Planning Commission
Section
Planning Commission
Subject
Full Packet
Document Date
11/17/2025
Retention
After
Protection
Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
639
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
6. This activity will clearly be considered an attractive nuisance and may attract children who <br />are present at the site and there are separate rules for that. <br />7. Please keep in mind the photos you see, have made it impossible to use the site at peak <br />season for annual removal of all the residents boats. <br />Gabriel <br />While I understand the County is proposing to eliminate the "vertical access" in order to <br />accommodate commercial and industrial uses at North Arm Landing, I have not heard whether the <br />County also intends to eliminate those commercial/industrial uses from the site altogether. <br />If those uses are allowed to continue, I believe the County may be in violation of certain sections of <br />the Minnesota Building Code related to public safety. <br />My concern is that building officials may only evaluate conditions within the construction site itself, <br />without considering safety impacts in off -site, public areas that are being used for staging, loading, <br />or other construction -related activities. <br />Construction sites and heavy machinery are "attractive nuisances." An "attractive nuisance," is a <br />legal doctrine used in civil liability cases but is not specifically called out in Minnesota Statutes or <br />rules. Nevertheless, there is case law Minnesota where this is defined (see below). <br />Section 3306 of the 2015 MN Building Code (httl2s://codes.iccsafe.org/content/MBC2015/chapter- <br />33-safeguards-during-construction) deals with requirements for safety barriers and protections at <br />construction sites, including provisions to protect pedestrians from hazards posed by nearby <br />construction activities. Section 3308 deals with the temporary storage of materials used for <br />construction. <br />MN BUILDING CODE - SECTION 3306 - PROTECTION OF PEDESTRIANS <br />3306.1 Protection required. Pedestrians shall be protected during construction, remodeling <br />and demolition activities as required by this chapter and Table 3306.1. Signs shall be provided <br />to direct pedestrian traffic... <br />3306.3 Directional barricades. Pedestrian traffic shall be protected by a directional <br />barricade where the walkway extends into the street. The directional barricade shall be of <br />sufficient size and construction to direct vehicular traffic away from the pedestrian path. <br />3306.4 Construction railings. Construction railings shall be not less than 42 inches (1067 <br />208 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.