My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-17-2025 - Agenda Packet Planning Commission - Full Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2025
>
11-17-2025 - Agenda Packet Planning Commission - Full Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/12/2026 10:57:18 AM
Creation date
11/14/2025 3:44:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Administration
Admin Doc Type
Agenda Packet Planning Commission
Section
Planning Commission
Subject
Full Packet
Document Date
11/17/2025
Retention
After
Protection
Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
639
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
wander into the equipment -operation area. They are especially vulnerable to lawsuits since the <br />"remedy' could be easily achieved by requiring fencing or monitoring the site. <br />https://minnesota.lexroll.com/gimmestad-v-rose-brothers-co-inc-194-minn-531-1935L <br />utm_sou rce=chatgpt.com <br />Citation from Best v. District of Columbia, 291 U.S. 411, 419, 54 S.Ct. 487, 491, 78 L. ed. 882, 887. In <br />the Best case, from which these quotations are made, the court held [syllabus, 78 L. ed. 882, 883]: <br />"The owner of a wharf, unfenced, close to the street, and with a barrier partly down, upon <br />which children are attracted to play by piles of sand unloaded thereon, may be held liable <br />for the death of a five -year -old child who, while playing there, fell through a hole and was <br />drowned." And there, as here, if the persons in charge of the property [291 U.S. 419] "had <br />reason to anticipate that use, there was a duty to take reasonable precautions either to <br />prevent it or to keep" the premises in such shape and state of repair that children would not <br />be exposed to the danger incident to such use. <br />From: <br />To: 'Gigi Jabbour' <gigil@minnetonkamarina.com>;'GABRIELJABBOUR' <gabrieljabbourlcDmsn.com> <br />Subject: Would the proposed expansion for barges at the North Arm Launch meet the definition of a <br />Marine Terminal? <br />29 CFR OSHA Maritime Regulations Part 1917 and 1918 Marine terminal means wharves, <br />bulkheads, quays, piers, docks and other berthing locations and adjacent storage or adjacent areas <br />and structures associated with the primary movement of cargo or materials from vessel to shore or <br />shore to vessel including structures which are devoted to receiving, handling, holding, consolidating <br />and loading or delivery of waterborne shipments or passengers, including areas devoted to the <br />maintenance of the terminal or equipment. The term does not include production or manufacturing <br />areas nor does the term include storage facilities directly associated with those production or <br />manufacturing areas. <br />1910.16(a)(1) Part 1918 of this chapter shall apply exclusively, according to the provisions thereof, <br />to all employment of every employee engaged in longshoring operations or related employment <br />aboard any vessel. All cargo transfer accomplished with the use of shore -based material handling <br />devices shall be governed by part 1917 of this chapter. <br />29 Sub B Chapter 17 Part 1918 Longshoring operations means the loading, unloading, moving or <br />handling of cargo, ship's stores, gear, or any other materials, into, in, on, or out of any vessel. <br />From: Gigi Jabbour [mailto:giei(@minnetonkamarina.com] <br />Sent: Friday, October 17, 2025 11:35 AM <br />Subject: Osha <br />Gigi Jabbour, CMM <br />204 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.