Laserfiche WebLink
The proposed improvements to the North Arm access to make it easier to launch <br />commercial -industrial equipment will result more heavy equipment, earth movers, <br />trailers with several tons or rock, and other industrial equipment using residential <br />streets. This sort of use is incompatible with residential neighborhoods and is contrary <br />the fundamentals of thoughtful land use planning. Facilitating more commercial - <br />industrial use at the North Arm access will create public safety concerns, noise issues, <br />lead to conflicts at the access, increase the cost and frequency of repairs to surrounding <br />streets, and will require more county oversight and maintenance of the access. <br />Improvements to the North Arm access must be done in context of overall access needs of <br />the entire lake and within the context of the carrying capacity of the bays near the <br />access. The County must find and dedicate a commercial -industrial access on the lake <br />which can be designed and maintained to support large equipment, have adequate <br />areas for storage and staging, and which meets the needs of contractors who use heavy <br />equipment. Contractors and marina owners have already told the county that many <br />commercial -industrial uses require several hours to unload, take days to months to <br />complete the projects, and they will need to be places for staging and to parking for <br />days. The North Arm access lacks the space and is the wrong location for commercial - <br />industrial uses. It is unclear why these concerns are still not reflected in the proposed <br />redesign. <br />It is unclear how the proposed design of the North Arm access fits within the Lake <br />Minnetonka Access Plan developed and approved by the LMCD, DNR, County, cities, and <br />others on Lake Minnetonka. Without clearly demonstrating the proposed redesign of <br />the North Arm access in consistent with the Lake Minnetonka Access Plan and generally <br />accepted zoning principles, homeowners and others may have a basis to sue for <br />injunctive relief to prevent the reconstruction of the site. This will add unnecessary <br />delays and costs to the project. <br />History and intent of North Arm access has been for an access for fishermen and family use. <br />The large commercial -industrial use of it would not only be in conflict with those who <br />use it now but it would create an imminent danger for the less experienced <br />boater/driver using the access. <br />It has been over 30 years since an access survey was done for Lake Minnetonka and has <br />been over 20 years since a boat count has been done. A redesign to encourage more <br />commercial -industrial use at the North Arm Access without first understanding overall <br />access needs, changes in the numbers, sizes, or types of boats on Lake Minnetonka, and <br />the needs of commercial -industrial contractors is a mistake. The proposed design is, at <br />best, based on anecdotal information. <br />Some improvements are needed at the North Arm access to reduce trash, improve parking, <br />make it easier to launch recreational boats, and help prevent the transport of AIS. But <br />no changes should be made to facilitate commercial -industrial use. <br />149 <br />