My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-11-1985 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1985
>
03-11-1985 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/13/2025 12:17:03 PM
Creation date
11/13/2025 12:08:09 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
371
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
a <br />City of ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. 1646 <br />b) Relocate west access to a more central location on west wall <br />and removal of existing office area to allow better flow and <br />circulation within the store. The 188 sf of office area will <br />not be used as commercial sales area but shall serve only as <br />open circulation area. <br />c) The exterior alterations involve construction of a second <br />story lof t area, new roof , removal of canopy on south side of <br />existing structure, privacy fencing around outdoor sales area <br />and 3 1/2' split rail fence along the boundaries of the <br />property. Applicants propose no commercial use of the loft <br />as the loft will be used for display and decorative purposes. <br />No public access to loft will be allowed. <br />5. Council has approved applicants request to remove the <br />residential unit within the existing structure finding no <br />intensification or extension of the commercial use of the <br />residential property based on the following findings: <br />a) The area occupied by the residential unit shall be used <br />solely for storage, lunch room/employee lounge and new <br />office. The approximate 450 sf of the residence apartment <br />may never be used for commercial sales area. <br />b) The structure has not contained a residence since late <br />1970's. <br />c) The City Inspector has never issued a certificate of <br />occupancy for the rehabilitated apartment. <br />d) The previous lessee and current applicants note the <br />following drawbacks in renting such a unit to an employee or <br />owner: <br />(1) The existing apartment is too small and cannot <br />provide adequate living area. <br />(2) A responsible agent of the store would never want to <br />live there. <br />(3) Since the applicants all own their own homestead <br />farms, they could not claim the apartment legally as <br />their residence. <br />(4) A single renter may not wish to be subjected to the <br />possible dangers of breakins and the associated <br />responsibilities. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.