Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MARCII 11, 1985. PAGE <br />#884 RICHARD ELLER Mayor Butler stated *hat as a result of the attorney's <br />request, she suggested tabling the application until March <br />25, 1985 when the attorney and/or applicant can be present. <br />Edward Stanke of 2660 Pheasant Road stated that the applicant <br />has been using every means possible to delay the application <br />and by the time the City resolves the issue the lake will be <br />open and the boat back into the water. Stanke asked for <br />immediate action on the application since this has been going <br />on since September. Stanke stated that an ordinance isn't <br />any good if the City isn't going to enforce that ordinance. <br />Stanke stated that Eller has kept his boat therefor two years <br />and none of the neighbors like it. Stanke explained that he <br />has had his home for sale and that the location of the boat has <br />scared off potential buyers. Stanke noted that the snow has <br />melted off and Eller is able to move the boat but Eller <br />refuses. <br />Mayor Butler explained that the proper procedure has been <br />followed and that Eller has responded to the letters of staff <br />by applying for the variance. Butler noted that sometimes <br />the process is a little slower than everyone would like, but <br />that Eller is allowed due process just like anyone else. <br />Butler stated that the item will be tabled and staff will <br />notify Eller that action will be taken at the March 25, 1985, <br />Council meeting regardless of whether applicant and/or <br />attorney is present. <br />City Attorney Radio noted for the record that Eller has <br />submitted a letter stating that he will not park the boat on <br />his property next year. <br />Councilmember Frahm moved, Councilmember T. Adams seconded, <br />to table the Eller variance application until March 25, 1985, <br />at which time the City will take action on the variance <br />whether or not the attorney and/or applicant is present. <br />Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (1). <br />Councilmember L. Adams voted nay. Adams felt that normally <br />when someone is in violation of a City ordinance, that person <br />should be issued a citation first. Adams stated that Eller <br />should be applying for an after -the -fact variance and the <br />issue promptly resolved. <br />Zoning Administrator Mabusth explainer? that the normal <br />procedure for violators is for staff to write a letter <br />notifying the resident of that violation and wait for the <br />resident's response. Mabusth stated then the City writes a <br />second letter threatening the issuance of a citation if the <br />resident hasn't responded. Mabusth noted that if a resident <br />still hasn't responded, a citation is then issued. Mabusth <br />explained that Eller responded at the second stage by <br />applying for the variance claiming that the topography of his <br />property will not allow the storage of the boat elsewhere on <br />his property. Mabusth noted that Eller claims that moving <br />the twat will harm the boat which was confirmed by a marina, <br />owncy, and the City Engineer. <br />