My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-25-1985 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1985
>
02-25-1985 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/13/2025 11:32:01 AM
Creation date
11/13/2025 11:28:28 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
176
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 11, 1985. PAGE 6 <br />Councilmember Grabek felt that the general concensus of the <br />Council is that they would like to give a variance to this <br />applicant because of the hardships, and before the Council <br />gets to the point of creating an additional hardship on this <br />individual by giving him maybe 2-31, which is the same as <br />giving 20-25' , he felt it should be approved. Grabek sated <br />that the Council should not pull figures/numbers out of the <br />air with no specific reason or engineering rationale. <br />Grabek felt that before the Council gets to the point where <br />they would create additional hardship for the applicant by <br />not making the deck desireable or useable after redesigning <br />the deck, he felt it should be approved. Grabek felt that <br />the Counci l's general trend is that the Counci 1 is going to <br />allow some type of variance, and if they allow some type of <br />variance to the 75' setback zone regulation, then the Counci 1 <br />should give the applicant the 20'. <br />David Kirscht asked that. the 1/2" strip condition be removed <br />in that it would create a "trip strip" because the decking <br />does not have railings, and people would trip over this 1/2" <br />strip. <br />Council agreed that the "trip strip" condition could be <br />removed as long as the applicant places this strip along any <br />portion of the deck that does have railings. <br />#887 FREDERICK WINSTON <br />765 SPRING HILL RD <br />VARIANCE <br />RESOLUTION #1727* Councilmember T. Adams moved, Councilmember L. Adams <br />seconded, to approve Resolution #1727, A Resolution <br />approving A Variance for Frederick Winston to permit <br />construction of a storage building. Motion, Ayes (5), Nays <br />(0). <br />#890 CLIFF OTTEN <br />875 WAYZATA BLVD <br />CONCEPTUAL REVIEW <br />C1if f ord Otten waf present. Otten informed Council that he <br />was just polling them on whether the City would like this type <br />of use in Orono and what locations they would prefer. Otten <br />stated that this proposed site at 875 Wayzata Blvd would make <br />it possible for him to combine his Long Lake and Wayzata <br />businesses into one building. Otten stated that he doesn't <br />know if this location will work or not so he may go back to his <br />other possible locations. <br />Councilmember T. Adams stated that this was a perfect use in <br />that its non-sewered commercial. Adams stated that it still <br />gives the surroundings a rural touch. Adams stated that <br />nurseries are ideal in this type of non-sewered commercial <br />zoning district. Adams stated that performance standards <br />should be developed for this possible type of non-sewered <br />commercial zoning. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.