My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-11-1985 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1985
>
02-11-1985 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/13/2025 11:16:44 AM
Creation date
11/13/2025 11:06:58 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
348
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 11, 1985. PAGE 5 <br />Counci lmem'-,er Frahm and T. Adams asked that a compromi se he <br />reached maybe by extending only 10 percent into the 0-75' <br />zone and placing decking on the side. They felt that the 20 <br />percent variance was too much to a 1 low and that a 10 percent <br />variance would be better. <br />David Kirscht stated that from a design and function <br />standpoint it would not be feasible. <br />Mayor Butler withdrew the motion. <br />Counci lmember L. Adams stated that he would amend hi s second <br />if the motion was made for a 10 percent variance rather than 20 <br />percent. <br />Councilmember Grabek explained that if the City was going to <br />give the applicant a 10 percent variance, they may as well <br />give him the 20 percent variance. Grabek stated that by <br />giving the applicant only 10 percent it doesn't make the deck <br />very desireable or useable; therefore, the City should be <br />strict and consistent and not allow any structure within the <br />0-75' zone. Grabek noted if the City's philosophy is going <br />to change and allow structures within that 0-75' zone, what <br />is the difference between l0-20'. Grabek noted the City may <br />as we] 1 let the applicant have the 20 percent if they are going <br />to change their philosophy. Grabek cisked the Council why <br />penalize the applicant 10' just so the Council feels safer <br />that they are staying within the 75' setback. <br />Richard Racatz agreed with Councilmember Crabek in that if <br />the City onl.y approved a 10 percent variance the deck would <br />not be as functional. <br />Mayor Butler suggested that Council pick a number to gi ve the <br />applicant guidelines on redesigning his deck. <br />Councilmember Grabek stated that puts the Council in an <br />awkward position in that it makes someone pull out of the air a <br />number that they feel appropriate without any basic sound <br />engineering judgment or any science of deckina_, or movement <br />of people, and opening of windows or doors. <br />Councilmember Grabek moved, Mayc,r Butler seconded, to <br />approve the setback variance for Richard Ragatzto construct <br />the proposed deck and direct staff to draft a resolution of <br />approval incorporating all of the findings and conditions <br />made in Mayor Butler's previous motion. Motion, Ayes (4), <br />Nays (1). <br />Councilmember Tim Adams voted nay. <br />Councilmember L. Adams asked why Councilmember Grabek <br />changed his opinion. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.