My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-28-1985 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1985
>
01-28-1985 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/13/2025 10:48:21 AM
Creation date
11/13/2025 10:43:40 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
207
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
COFFIN A GRONBFRG, INC. <br />`.4URVE YING, ENGINEERING AND LAND PLANNING <br />402•A TAMARACK AVENUE <br />LONG LAKE, MINN. 55356 <br />January 9, 1985 <br />To: City of Orono <br />Re: Hardcover Calculations & Sto rmwater Runoff <br />I have worked on numerous projects and permit applications requiring <br />approval of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District(MCWD) engineers over the <br />past 10 years and I fully agree with their concerns regarding increases in <br />stormwater runoff into Lake Minnetonka. 1 also commend the City of Orono for <br />their concerns and regulations covering this runoff. However, I feel that <br />certain improvements or structures have different runoff coefficients which <br />should be taken into account, much as the MCWD engineers do in considering <br />applications made to them. <br />There are many publications listing coefficients of runoff(C factors), <br />and I have enclosed a copy of the table used by the Minnesota Highway Dep- <br />artment in their drainage manual. The usual factors 1 use which are accept- <br />abie to the MCWD engineers are 1.00 or 100% runoff for rooftops, 0.90 or 90% <br />runoff from blacktop surfaces, 0.50 or 50% for gravel surfaces, and 0.30-0.40 <br />or 30-40% from existing ground surfaces depending on slope and veqetation. <br />Thus, I believe that gravel walks and decks should not be lumped together <br />with rooftops in considering hardcover calculations. <br />In the case of the William Krutzig property of Tract A, Registered Land <br />Survev 14o. 565, the following proposal shows measures taken to reduce the <br />impact of runoff from a deck so that all runoff is directed to the soil be- <br />low. A half -inch high wood strip will be placed around the outside of the <br />deck to restrict water from running off the ends and keep it either on the <br />deck surface or running down through the spaces between the deck boards. <br />Underneath the deck a one -foot layer of sand would be placed on level gro and <br />in order to disperse the water over the entire soil area beneath the sand <br />in much the same manner that a sand layer is uskd in a mound type drainfield <br />system. With a small amount of water staying on the deck or being absorbed <br />by the deck boards, the net runoff should be less than or equal to that from <br />the original ground. <br />Although not proposed in this case, it appears that temporary storage <br />areas or basins could be used to reduce runoff into the lake. The MCWD re- <br />quires the use of temporary storage basins for projects in order to reduce <br />the runoff rate after construction to the rate prior to development. It seems <br />that this method could also be used for individual residences since the de- <br />sired goal of less runoff to the lake would be met. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.