Laserfiche WebLink
The applicant's attorney has compiled a packet of exhibits and <br />findings seekinq your approval (See Exhibit G). <br />The property is located on a very busy curve. Remember the road <br />at the north is Tonkaview not Park Avenue. Park Avenue is probably <br />located at the grassed -in old driveway access where the utility poles <br />have been placed. Access to this site is crucial. Staff and Planning <br />Commission recommend the access be from Tonkaview via Adams Avenue and <br />Park Avenue. Applicant has agreed to this access and has placed the <br />house and garage accordingly. <br />Sewer is available and the original assessment payment will be <br />paid to the City over the ten-year period. <br />The house has been placed on the site meeting all required <br />setbacks. Note that this is a "corner" lot for setback purpose, and <br />the proposed house exceeds the required 35' front setback (54' <br />proposed) and meets the 10' side setback requirements (20' and 10' <br />proposed). <br />Two lots combined as a building site was a typical development <br />pattern in earlier years, but in recent years, the pattern has been to <br />combine three or four lots as a building site. <br />At their April 16, 1984 meeting, Planning Commission advised <br />Caples that the city would approve of the partial vacation of Park <br />Avenue. The vacation would enable applicant to acquire additional <br />lots on north side of Park Avenue for combination with subject <br />property. I have enclosed copies cf letters to the two property <br />owners advising them of Caples intent. Turney and Campbell as joint <br />owners of Lots 15, 16, 17 and 18 plan to develop the property as one <br />building site. They have not had the area confirmed by a surveyor but <br />it is their guess that they have .8 acres or 80%. They have advised <br />Caples that based on the 80% standard for sewered properties, they <br />would have no interest in selling off one of the lots. <br />The second exchange of letters asked for the 15' of right-of-way <br />that would revert back to parcels 15, 16, 17 and 18 (Lots 6-10, Block <br />2) upon vacation of Park Avenue. Paul Campbell called Jeanne Mahusth <br />from Washingtcn to seek confirmation of the area of the four lots and <br />was advised that only a surveyor could do this. He understood Caples <br />dilemma but based on the approximate guess on area, he would not be <br />willing to release the 3,000 s.f. of additional area. If a survey is <br />made confirming the area of Lots 6-10, they would he willing to <br />release the vacated right-of-way for sale to Caples. <br />Caples declined to spend additional money for a survey of <br />Campbell'F. properties. <br />At their July 16, 1984 meeting, Planning Commission recommended <br />conceptual approval of the variance application based on Council's <br />approval of the partial vacation of Park Avenue,which would increase <br />the lot area to 0.42 acre. <br />