Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 14, 1985 PAGE 4 <br />Jerry Wheeler told Mabusth that this wasn't the point. <br />Wheeler stated that one of the Councilmembers has a <br />large boat stored on his property, but the boat is not <br />stored next to the lot line, or stored where the <br />neighbors have to look at it. Wheeler stated that the <br />Councilmember was not, in his opinion, violating the <br />spirit and intent of the ordinance. Wheeler stated <br />that it is up to the Council to interpret the ordinance. <br />Councilmember T. Adams stated that he would like staff <br />to come back to the Council with their analysis and <br />recommendation on Wheeler's problem. Adams felt that <br />it shouldn't be tied -in with any other situation that is <br />before the City. <br />Councilmember L. Adams stated that he has an oversized <br />boat in his yard and a few years ago he had an old truck in <br />his yard and was ticketed by Orono for this violation. <br />Adams noted that some of the City ordinances are too <br />restrictive and this particular ordinance is one of <br />them. Adams noted that a recommendation should be <br />obtained from staff. Adams felt that if there was <br />illegal excavation, that this should be addressed by <br />staff. <br />Councilmember Lynn Adams moved, Mayor Butler seconded, <br />to direct the Orono staff to investigate and report back <br />to the Council regarding the alledqed violations (boat <br />storage and expansion of hardcover) at the Johnson <br />resident, and for staff to write a letter and follow <br />normal procedures if the boat is found to be in <br />violation of the ordinances. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays <br />(0). <br />#874 DUANE BARTH i <br />MRS DONALD JOHNSTONE <br />1810 SHADYWOOD ROAD <br />VARIANCE <br />RESOLUTION #1718 <br />Applicants were not present. Councilmember L. Adams <br />stated that he had this item removed from the Consent <br />Agenda for discussion because he does not feel that this <br />va r i ance should be approves?. Adams noted that t h i s lot <br />has not always been held as a separate lot for a future <br />building site. Adams stated that the most significant <br />f inding was that the two lots had been used as one lot , <br />with the house on one lot, the garage un the other lot , <br />and the driveway crossing both lots. Adams stated that <br />this indicated that the owners of the lot simply <br />considered this one lot. Adams not( d tha* the existing <br />house . _, only 50' away from the lake an . a hardcover <br />runof f has been of f set by the open lot ne Adams <br />stated that when that open lot is b ..r:, that <br />offsetting assistance to the hardcover ii- will not <br />be present. <br />