My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-14-1985 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1985
>
01-14-1985 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/13/2025 10:37:02 AM
Creation date
11/13/2025 10:24:50 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
399
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
7. Although raiking lal-qe amounts of money for the purp;ot-7,e of <br />improving the park: was not contemplated in the will, Bennett is <br />against it as it could ret5ult in a change of character in the park.. <br />Gray summarized this section by stating that the will clearly <br />intended Nuer-enbe rg Park to be c{ low-key although well. -kept place to <br />visit. <br />Commento on thu interpretation of the will centered ()n whether <br />funding for the park its indicated in the will would btr enough to <br />providu for a well -maintained par,.. PLIeStions included: <br />Could county funda be iced? Gould basic facilities st.rch as a <br />parf:.ing lot or restrooms be constructed from the earnings? Jessen <br />stated that earnings could be :Jr 12rJ,00(-)/year. Operating expenses <br />in 1905 total $77,000. <br />Is the interpretation too narrow? Glen Ray stated that Denne+t's <br />interpretation of the w: 1 l seemed to be in conflict with the <br />interpretation of the original committee. Gray suggest(?d that <br />furthnr~ efforts at interpretation be investigated. He requeLted <br />that members of the committee ta!::e time to review the will and <br />Bennett-'s interpretation themselves. He also suggested that thc• <br />county gain additional insight intu the intent of the will by way <br />of an interpretation by the County Attorney ' s office. <br />Aro.g!:q .gyp_ Home DF�mcrostration Gardenp <br />Mike Heger made a p,esentation on the Home Demonstration (ar-dens <br />currently being developed at the University of Minnesota Landscape <br />Arboretum. The philosophy of the gardens is to display small garden <br />spaces that homeowners can easily relate to. Themes included fruits <br />and vegetablew, kitchen herbs, dwarf and small growing plants. <br />wildflawers, vt'c. It wa% stated that the- concept of the Home <br />Demonstration garden was also conceive -id by the original Noerenberg <br />Committee prior to the Arboretum' beginning itss plans. <br />Ihgmr:5s_ <br />Gray opened up discussion for ideal; from the committee as to <br />themes that might be incorporated into the gardens. Ideas included: <br />Vi Ltori an <br />Old English <br />Minnesota native plants <br />Winter garden <br />Estate gardens <br />It was suggested that resources for the garden planning and design <br />be an individual or firm of national significance. <br />J&S, Seh suggested that these terms be defined for the nr;,:: t meeting <br />in order that .a distinction be made between then. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.